[#17566] rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...>

I've put together a shell script that runs checks on a Ruby interpreter.

14 messages 2008/07/03

[#17615] [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>

At the moment, ruby-mode.el uses font-lock-keywords as opposed to

22 messages 2008/07/05
[#17657] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

[#17678] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/09

It was designed to fix the following case:

[#17755] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/13

Here's a third patch that fixes a bug in the second and uses a quicker

[#17772] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

One more patch which fixes a few bugs in the the last one.

[#17773] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17776] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Looks like version 22 doesn't support explicitly numbered regexp groups.

[#17779] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17783] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17788] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Alright, here's a version that fixes both the highlighting bug and the

[#17793] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,

[#17644] Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all

27 messages 2008/07/08

[#17674] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] (Open) Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...>

Issue #238 has been reported by Jim Deville.

10 messages 2008/07/08

[#17708] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>

Issue #252 has been reported by Ryan Davis.

13 messages 2008/07/09

[#17871] duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>

While nil is an object, calling dup on it causes TypeError. This doesnt seem

33 messages 2008/07/20
[#17872] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Nasir Khan wrote:

[#17873] Re: duping the NilClass — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/07/20

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#17877] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Meinrad Recheis wrote:

[#17879] Re: duping the NilClass — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#17880] Re: duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...> 2008/07/21

I write a lot of hand crafted dup or clone because I want control as well as

[#17881] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17882] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/21

+1 to David. A convenient way to do Marshal idiom should be a new

[#17885] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#17887] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17889] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#17883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] (Open) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Issue #340 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.

14 messages 2008/07/21

[#17943] RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

56 messages 2008/07/24
[#17950] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/25

In article <3454c9680807241200xf7cc766qb987905a3987bb78@mail.gmail.com>,

[#17958] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,

[#17981] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/26

In article <3454c9680807250054i70db563duf44b42d92ba41bfb@mail.gmail.com>,

[ruby-core:17653] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1

From: "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Date: 2008-07-08 11:55:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #17653
There are two things I would like to see added to 1.9.1. A one-byte
trap instruction and more of the VM headers exposed so that
introspection packages don't have to duplicate headers as nodewrap
currently does. I'd be happy to work up a patch for the one-byte trap
instruction.

A one-byte trap instruction facilitates debugging or tracing by
instruction replacement. I mentioned this in ruby core 16 Apr 2008
(http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/16405)

Right now there is a two byte trap instruction where the second byte
is an event type. The event type for the one-byte trap can be implied
and can be filled in by the interpreter code to be either a line event
or a new event enumeration value.  This way, the same Ruby trace hook
as the two byte instruction can be used.

A one-byte trap instruction ensures that the instruction can replace
any of the existing instructions safely. With a two-byte instruction a
lot more magic has go on.

This alone would not be enough to do debugging by instruction
replacement, but it seems like a necessary and relatively unobtrusive
first step.  After this there would need to be some way to patch code
with this instruction at a particular place which saves the old opcode
somewhere so that on return from this instruction the VM interpreter
can put this back and execute the old instruction in place (possibly
removing the trap).

I don't know if the VM can do this now but a mode where a hook can get
after each VM instruction would also allow for (slow) debugging and
could be used with the one-byte trap to help reset it when that is
desired.

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> On 20 Jun, Matz, ko1, shyouhei and I told about the release management
> of Ruby 1.9. And the management tasks were assigned to me.
>
> At first, I want to decide what features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1.
>
> == Schedule
> As mentioned before (http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/07/rubykaigi),
> Ruby 1.9.1 will be released at 20 Dec.
>
> I intend to release snapshots as bellow:
> * 1.9.0-3 snapshot release  at 25 Jul
> * 1.9.0-4 snapshot release  at 25 Aug
> * 1.9.0-5 snapshot release
>   and feature freeze       at 25 Sep
> * 1.9.1 rc1                 at 25 Oct
> * 1.9.1 rc2                 at 25 Nov
> * 1.9.1                     at 20 Dec
>
> == Features to be included
> I must decide what to be included and what not to be included.
> For example,
> * Of course, YARV itself will be included. It have already been merged.
> * Multi-VM will not, because it needs more time. ko1 said it will be
> implemented by 1.9.5 :-)
>
> Committers and anyone who intend to write patches, let me know your
> plan. What features will be implemented by 25 Sep? What will not?
>
> * How about the improved version of transcode?
> * What platforms should be supported?
>  * How about OS/2?
>  * How about VMS? Can anyone build the trunk version on VMS?
>
> --
> Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp>
> http://yugui.jp
>
>

In This Thread