ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#17477] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] (Open) "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Tobi Reif <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been reported by Tobi Reif.

2 messages 2008/07/01
[#17689] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] (Closed) "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #211 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17479] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] (Open) Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #212 has been reported by Federico Builes.

6 messages 2008/07/01
[#18249] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Kouji Takao <redmine@...> 2008/08/12

Issue #212 has been updated by Kouji Takao.
[#18250] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Federico Builes <redmine@...> 2008/08/12

Issue #212 has been updated by Federico Builes.
[#17754] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Kouji Takao <redmine@...> 2008/07/13

Issue #212 has been updated by Kouji Takao.
[#18273] [Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Kouji Takao <redmine@...> 2008/08/13

Issue #212 has been updated by Kouji Takao.
[#18311] [Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Federico Builes <redmine@...> 2008/08/15

Issue #212 has been updated by Federico Builes.

[#17480] Array#fill behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/07/01
[#17481] Re: Array#fill behavior — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/01

In article <3454c9680807010555i7bb90075h5b0665dcff69e0a9@mail.gmail.com>,
[#17482] Re: Array#fill behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/01

Hi,
[#17483] Re: Array#fill behavior — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/01

In article <3454c9680807010954y78032e71o32fb07f075c7cbc9@mail.gmail.com>,

[#17485] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

1 message 2008/07/01

[#17486] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Tobi Reif <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Tobi Reif.

1 message 2008/07/01

[#17487] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

1 message 2008/07/01

[#17488] HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>

MRI currently expects the HOME environment variable to be set under Windows=

6 messages 2008/07/01
[#17489] Re: HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/01

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:29 AM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#17490] Re: HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/07/01

Luis Lavena:
[#17492] Re: HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/07/01

John Lam:
[#17496] Re: HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/02

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:33 AM, John Lam (IRONRUBY) <jflam@microsoft.com> wrote:
[#17498] Re: HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/02

Hi,

[#17491] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] (Open) Different ERB behavior across versions — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #213 has been reported by Federico Builes.

5 messages 2008/07/01
[#17721] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] (Closed) Different ERB behavior across versions — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #213 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#17714] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] Different ERB behavior across versions — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #213 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#17716] Re: [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] Different ERB behavior across versions — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/10

Hi,
[#17827] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] Different ERB behavior across versions — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/07/18

Issue #213 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#17493] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #212 has been updated by Roger Pack.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17494] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #212 has been updated by Federico Builes.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17495] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17497] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #212] Issues with Readline in Mac OS X — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Issue #212 has been updated by Luis Lavena.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17500] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Tobi Reif <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Tobi Reif.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17501] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #211] "wrong argument type" "expected Proc" — Brian Candler <redmine@...>

Issue #211 has been updated by Brian Candler.

1 message 2008/07/02

[#17503] Possible misbehaviour in mkmf.rb package — S駻gio Durigan J佖ior <sergiodj@...>

Hello all,

4 messages 2008/07/02
[#17505] Re: Possible misbehaviour in mkmf.rb package — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/07/02

On Wednesday 02 July 2008, S駻gio Durigan J佖ior wrote:
[#17507] Re: Possible misbehaviour in mkmf.rb package — S駻gio Durigan J佖ior <sergiodj@...> 2008/07/02

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:55 +0200, Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#17531] Re: Possible misbehaviour in mkmf.rb package — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/07/03

On Wednesday 02 July 2008, S駻gio Durigan J佖ior wrote:

[#17509] YAML in Ruby — Trans <transfire@...>

Might we ever imagine a time when YAML is an integral part of Ruby?

5 messages 2008/07/02
[#17511] Re: YAML in Ruby — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/02

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17512] Re: YAML in Ruby — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/02

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17513] Re: YAML in Ruby — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/02

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17520] Re: YAML in Ruby — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/02

On Jul 2, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Trans wrote:

[#17518] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] (Open) Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...>

Issue #216 has been reported by Igal Koshevoy.

10 messages 2008/07/02
[#17548] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Rolando Abarca <redmine@...> 2008/07/03

Issue #216 has been updated by Rolando Abarca.
[#17550] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...> 2008/07/03

Issue #216 has been updated by Igal Koshevoy.
[#17572] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/07/03

Issue #216 has been updated by Anonymous.
[#17571] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/07/03

Issue #216 has been updated by Anonymous.
[#17596] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Rolando Abarca <redmine@...> 2008/07/04

Issue #216 has been updated by Rolando Abarca.
[#17608] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...> 2008/07/04

Issue #216 has been updated by Igal Koshevoy.
[#17613] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/05

Hi,
[#17622] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...> 2008/07/05

Hi,
[#17621] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...> 2008/07/05

Issue #216 has been updated by Igal Koshevoy.

[#17523] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #222] (Open) Issues with Date#<=> — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #222 has been reported by Federico Builes.

2 messages 2008/07/03
[#21037] [Bug #222](Closed) Issues with Date#<=> — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/01/01

Issue #222 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#17534] Re: We'll release 1.8.6/1.8.7 this Friday — gdefty@...

Tim,

1 message 2008/07/03

[#17556] Another security issue — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>

This was posted by someone from the Red Hat Security Response Team.

2 messages 2008/07/03
[#17584] Re: Another security issue — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/04

The fix has already been there in the repository, FYI. My proposal for

[#17557] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #223] (Open) Net::FTP#sendport incompatible with Mathn library — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #223 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

2 messages 2008/07/03
[#17587] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #223] (Closed) Net::FTP#sendport incompatible with Mathn library — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/04

Issue #223 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17566] rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...>

I've put together a shell script that runs checks on a Ruby interpreter.

14 messages 2008/07/03
[#17568] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/03

Why not write it in ruby?
[#17582] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#17592] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

I've split up the code of rubychecker. One git repo has the GNU Bash
[#17594] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/04
[#17603] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/04

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17611] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/05

>M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17612] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/05
[#17618] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/05

At 2:45 PM +0900 7/5/08, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17577] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#17570] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/03

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[#17573] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17576] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/03

Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17578] Re: rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#17574] rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

I wanted to learn more about specs recently started using git and so

5 messages 2008/07/03
[#17580] Re: rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...> 2008/07/03

Stephen Bannasch wrote:
[#17581] Re: rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/03

At 7:53 AM +0900 7/4/08, Igal Koshevoy wrote:
[#17590] Re: rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/04

I've put up the code for RubyBuild in a git repository on github:
[#17586] Re: rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/04

Igal Koshevoy wrote:

[#17583] Singleton#_load in 1.8.6 — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...>

In revision 16659[1] a change was made to make Singleton#_load a

1 message 2008/07/04

[#17595] Crashes and hangups on latest 1_8 branch — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/07/04
[#17598] Re: Crashes and hangups on latest 1_8 branch — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/04
[#17600] Re: Crashes and hangups on latest 1_8 branch — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/04

Hi,
[#17616] Re: Crashes and hangups on latest 1_8 branch — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/05

Hi,

[#17609] [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

Hi, I'm trying to run rubyspec tests on 1.8 branch and get this error:

5 messages 2008/07/05
[#17610] Re: [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/05

In article <20080705011954.GA13417@marlasina>,
[#17617] Re: [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...> 2008/07/05

Installed version on my sistem:
[#17620] Re: [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/05

In article <20080705122157.GA5572@marlasina>,
[#17619] Re: [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/05

Hi,

[#17615] [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>

At the moment, ruby-mode.el uses font-lock-keywords as opposed to

22 messages 2008/07/05
[#17657] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

[#17678] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/09

It was designed to fix the following case:
[#17755] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/13

Here's a third patch that fixes a bug in the second and uses a quicker
[#17772] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

One more patch which fixes a few bugs in the the last one.
[#17773] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,
[#17774] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

I've been testing with 23.0.60, and I guess I used something new. I can
[#17776] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Looks like version 22 doesn't support explicitly numbered regexp groups.
[#17779] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,
[#17783] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,
[#17788] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Alright, here's a version that fixes both the highlighting bug and the
[#17793] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,
[#17794] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/16

Are you asking me? If so, go right ahead. Also, for posterity's sake,
[#17801] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/07/16

Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@gmail.com> writes:
[#17809] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/16

Phil Hagelberg wrote:
[#17805] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,
[#17808] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/16

Sure, I'll assign the copyright to whomever it needs to be assigned to.
[#17800] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/16

Here's one more (hopefully the last) bug fix.
[#17840] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/18

One more bugfix.
[#17869] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/20

Hi,
[#17875] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/20

Yeah, I think that's a good name. I've discovered one more bug, though,
[#17910] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/22

Alright, here's the last patch. I think it may still fail if the entire

[#17625] Can't have more than 2*21 unique symbols? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/07/06
[#17631] Re: Can't have more than 2*21 unique symbols? — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/06

I think this is related to an old, but intensional, spec around
[#17633] Re: Can't have more than 2*21 unique symbols? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/06

Hi,

[#17627] ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>

Is it possible to add ncurses-specific functions to curses ruby module?

8 messages 2008/07/06
[#17635] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/07/07

On Sunday 06 July 2008, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17636] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/07/07

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#17637] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/07/07

On Monday 07 July 2008, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17638] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/07/07

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:26:02PM +0200, Marc Haisenko wrote:
[#17639] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/07/07

On Monday 07 July 2008, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17641] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/07

On Jul 7, 2008, at 02:19 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17651] Re: ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/08

On 07/07/2008, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#17629] Proper exception out of throw? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/06

[#17634] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #229] (Open) CGI::Cookies can "get out of sync" — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Issue #229 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.

5 messages 2008/07/06
[#25554] [Bug #229](Closed) CGI::Cookies can "get out of sync" — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #229 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#25555] [Bug #229] CGI::Cookies can "get out of sync" — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #229 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26780] [Backport #229](Assigned) CGI::Cookies can "get out of sync" — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/17

Issue #229 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#30335] [Backport #229](Closed) CGI::Cookies can "get out of sync" — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/05/20

Issue #229 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#17640] File.open initialization error — MAwiniarski <MAwiniarski@...>

Greetings,

2 messages 2008/07/07
[#17648] Re: File.open initialization error — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/08

MAwiniarski wrote:

[#17642] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #231] (Open) Profile.rb uses old VM constant — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #231 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

1 message 2008/07/07

[#17643] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #232] (Open) profile: get error "can't creating binding object on top of Fiber" — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Issue #232 has been reported by Dave Thomas.

3 messages 2008/07/07
[#17649] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #232] (Open) profile: get error "can't creating binding object on top of Fiber" — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17650] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #232] (Closed) profile: get error "can't creating binding object on top of Fiber" — Dave Thomas <redmine@...> 2008/07/08

Issue #232 has been updated by Dave Thomas.

[#17644] Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all

27 messages 2008/07/08
[#17655] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17645] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/08

Hello,
[#17646] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/07/08

[#17658] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/07/08

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#17659] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/07/08

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#17663] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2008/07/08

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:49:37PM +0900, Sam Ruby wrote:
[#17662] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/08

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#17670] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/07/08

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#17671] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/08

[#17682] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Sam Ruby <rubys@...> 2008/07/09

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#17797] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/16

[#17815] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/17

On Jul 15, 2008, at 19:38 PM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#17817] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/17

>
[#17802] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/16

At 06:39 08/07/09, Jim Weirich wrote:
[#17807] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/16

On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
[#17647] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/08

At 11:59 08/07/08, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
[#17653] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/07/08

There are two things I would like to see added to 1.9.1. A one-byte
[#17654] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17656] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/07/08

Good. Thanks for the information!
[#17660] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17661] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/08

In article <E1KGF2L-0000Qx-K5@x61.netlab.jp>,
[#17664] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17665] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/08

In article <E1KGFC1-0000cJ-6y@x61.netlab.jp>,
[#17666] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,
[#17667] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/07/08

TWF0eiwgZGlkIHlvdSBjb25zaWRlciB0byBpbmNsdWRlIEVyaWMgTWFodXJpbidzIHBhdGNoIGFs
[#17668] Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

Hi,

[#17652] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] (Open) default charset of rdoc — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Issue #235 has been reported by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.

10 messages 2008/07/08
[#20875] [Feature #235](Closed) default charset of rdoc — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/12/26

Issue #235 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#17695] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] (Open) default charset of rdoc — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/09

Not sure sending this directly to this list is the right thing to do,
[#17697] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #235 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#17757] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] (Open) default charset of rdoc — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/07/14

Who's task?
[#17931] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/07/23

Issue #235 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#17938] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Martin Dürst <redmine@...> 2008/07/24

Issue #235 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
[#18785] [Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/09/22

Issue #235 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#18819] [Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/09/23

Issue #235 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#18842] [Feature #235] default charset of rdoc — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2008/09/24

Issue #235 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#17669] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #236] (Open) Segfault when multiple threads — Radosław Bułat <redmine@...>

Issue #236 has been reported by RadosナＢw BuナＢt.

2 messages 2008/07/08
[#17727] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #236] (Closed) Segfault when multiple threads — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #236 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#17672] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #237] (Open) Ruby-lang.org points to wrong bug tracker — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #237 has been reported by Anonymous.

4 messages 2008/07/08
[#17673] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #237] (Open) Ruby-lang.org points to wrong bug tracker — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/08

On Jul 8, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Anonymous wrote:
[#17677] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #237] (Closed) Ruby-lang.org points to wrong bug tracker — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #237 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#17685] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #237] Ruby-lang.org points to wrong bug tracker — James Gray <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #237 has been updated by James Gray.

[#17674] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] (Open) Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...>

Issue #238 has been reported by Jim Deville.

10 messages 2008/07/08
[#17676] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...> 2008/07/08

Issue #238 has been updated by Jim Deville.
[#17681] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #238 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#17692] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Luis Lavena <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #238 has been updated by Luis Lavena.
[#17703] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #238 has been updated by Jim Deville.
[#17719] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #238 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
[#17731] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #238 has been updated by Jim Deville.
[#17732] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Neil Stevens <neil@...> 2008/07/10

Jim Deville wrote:
[#17733] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Matthew Boeh <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #238 has been updated by Matthew Boeh.
[#17736] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #238 has been updated by Jim Deville.

[#17675] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #239] (Open) Zlib::Deflate#params can corrupt output — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Issue #239 has been reported by Eric Hodel.

2 messages 2008/07/08
[#17743] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #239] (Closed) Zlib::Deflate#params can corrupt output — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #239 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#17679] Two suggestions — Trans <transfire@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/09

[#17680] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #240] (Open) Arrow keys do not bring command history in IRB — Darcy Nogueira <redmine@...>

Issue #240 has been reported by Darcy Nogueira.

2 messages 2008/07/09
[#17693] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #240] (Rejected) Arrow keys do not bring command history in IRB — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #240 has been updated by Eric Hodel.

[#17683] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #244] (Open) Cookie parsing in webrick fails on too many semicolons — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Issue #244 has been reported by Aaron Patterson.

3 messages 2008/07/09
[#17684] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #244] Cookie parsing in webrick fails on too many semicolons — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #244 has been updated by Aaron Patterson.
[#17687] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #244] Cookie parsing in webrick fails on too many semicolons — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #244 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#17686] default compiler behaviour about trace insn. — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Please give me comments.

3 messages 2008/07/09
[#17701] Re: default compiler behaviour about trace insn. — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2008/07/09

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:13:35PM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17688] Re: default compiler behaviour about trace insn. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/07/09

[#17690] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #249] (Open) wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #249 has been reported by Roger Pack.

8 messages 2008/07/09
[#17696] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #249] (Open) wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/09

Hi --
[#17737] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #249] wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #249 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#19142] [Feature #249] wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/06

Issue #249 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#19145] Re: [Feature #249] wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/10/06

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Roger Pack <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#19144] [Feature #249] wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/06

Issue #249 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#25961] [Feature #249] wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/10/06

Issue #249 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#26171] [Feature #249](Rejected) wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/10/19

Issue #249 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#17694] Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>

Hi everyone,

10 messages 2008/07/09
[#17700] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/09

Hi,
[#17706] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2008/07/09

[#17725] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — "Straub, Marc-Oliver" <marc-oliver.straub@...> 2008/07/10

One possibility would be to use the Kernel.at_exit() method to =
[#17782] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2008/07/15

Hi Oli
[#17726] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/10

Hi,
[#17735] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2008/07/11

Hi Nobu,
[#17790] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/07/15

[#17791] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2008/07/15

Hi Brent,
[#17795] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,

[#17699] Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>

As far as I can tell, there's nowhere on the ruby-lang.org website

7 messages 2008/07/09
[#17707] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/09

On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#17710] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/09

[#17711] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/10

On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
[#17717] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/07/10

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#17722] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/10

On Jul 9, 2008, at 10:23 PM, Martin DeMello wrote:
[#17734] Re: Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2008/07/11

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:53 AM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:

[#17702] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-21101 ] Clash between accessor methods and local variable declaration — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/09

[#17704] Breaking changes in String#succ — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/09

[#17708] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>

Issue #252 has been reported by Ryan Davis.

13 messages 2008/07/09
[#20515] [Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2008/12/13

Issue #252 has been updated by Ryan Davis.
[#20516] [Bug #252](Closed) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/12/13

Issue #252 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#17709] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...> 2008/07/09

Issue #252 has been updated by Ryan Davis.
[#17720] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Vladimir Sizikov <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #252 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
[#18114] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/04

Hi,
[#18117] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/04

Hi,
[#18124] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/04

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18177] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...> 2008/08/07

On Aug 5, 3:49=A0am, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nut...@sun.com>
[#18181] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/07

Hi,
[#18182] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/07

Hi,
[#17712] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/07/10

[#17715] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/10

[#17713] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #253] (Open) Zlib::GzipWriter#mtime= sets wrong mtime for Time on 1.8 — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>

Issue #253 has been reported by Eric Hodel.

2 messages 2008/07/10
[#17744] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #253] (Closed) Zlib::GzipWriter#mtime= sets wrong mtime for Time on 1.8 — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #253 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#17718] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #254] (Open) PStore in Ruby 1.9.0.2 — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #254 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/07/10
[#17723] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #254] (Closed) PStore in Ruby 1.9.0.2 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #254 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17724] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #255] (Open) CGI element generation methods should convert keys/values to Strings before escaping. — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #255 has been reported by Anonymous.

3 messages 2008/07/10
[#17729] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #255] CGI element generation methods should convert keys/values to Strings before escaping. — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/07/10

Issue #255 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17828] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #255] CGI element generation methods should convert keys/values to Strings before escaping. — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/07/18

Issue #255 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.

[#17739] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #256] (Open) defined?(Gem::RubyGemsVersion) behaves strange — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Issue #256 has been reported by Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA.

4 messages 2008/07/11
[#20454] [Bug #256](Rejected) defined?(Gem::RubyGemsVersion) behaves strange — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/12/11

Issue #256 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#20455] [Bug #256] defined?(Gem::RubyGemsVersion) behaves strange — Jeremy Kemper <redmine@...> 2008/12/11

Issue #256 has been updated by Jeremy Kemper.
[#20491] [Bug #256] defined?(Gem::RubyGemsVersion) behaves strange — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/12/11

Issue #256 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#17740] Constant lookup within class methods — Tilman Giese <tilman@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/07/11
[#17741] Re: Constant lookup within class methods — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/11

Hi --
[#17742] Re: Constant lookup within class methods — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2008/07/11

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#17745] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Brent Roman <brent@...>

2 messages 2008/07/11
[#17781] Re: Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...> 2008/07/15

Hi Brent,

[#17746] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #259] (Open) String crypt method's salt argument should be optional — Richard Laager <redmine@...>

Issue #259 has been reported by Richard Laager.

3 messages 2008/07/11
[#17748] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #259] String crypt method's salt argument should be optional — Richard Laager <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #259 has been updated by Richard Laager.
[#29102] [Feature #259](Feedback) String crypt method's salt argument should be optional — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2010/03/29

Issue #259 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#17747] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #260] (Open) String should have a crypt! method — Richard Laager <redmine@...>

Issue #260 has been reported by Richard Laager.

3 messages 2008/07/11
[#17749] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #260] String should have a crypt! method — Richard Laager <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #260 has been updated by Richard Laager.
[#17750] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #260] (Rejected) String should have a crypt! method — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/07/11

Issue #260 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#17751] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #268] (Open) "make benchmark" segfaults on amd64 Linux gcc 4.3.1 — Ed Borasky <redmine@...>

Issue #268 has been reported by Ed Borasky.

2 messages 2008/07/13
[#17752] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #268] "make benchmark" segfaults on amd64 Linux gcc 4.3.1 — Ed Borasky <redmine@...> 2008/07/13

Issue #268 has been updated by Ed Borasky.

[#17759] Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Thank you for your replies to [ruby-core:17644]. < all

6 messages 2008/07/14
[#17761] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/14
[#17766] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/07/14

On 7/14/08, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@cesmail.net> wrote:
[#17775] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/15
[#17777] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2008/07/15

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17778] Re: Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/15

[#17760] ENV['PATH'] / Kernel#system behaviour — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/07/14
[#17764] Re: ENV['PATH'] / Kernel#system behaviour — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/07/14

Lars Christensen wrote:

[#17762] Toplevel Issues — Trans <transfire@...>

The toplevel (ie. main) can be quite aggravating when meta-

1 message 2008/07/14

[#17765] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #275] (Open) bug involving condition variables — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #275 has been reported by Anonymous.

3 messages 2008/07/14
[#17767] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #275] bug involving condition variables — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/14

Issue #275 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25546] [Bug #275](Closed) bug involving condition variables — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #275 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#17768] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #276] (Open) take_while functions inconsistently — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #276 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/07/14
[#17770] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #276] take_while functions inconsistently — Matthew Boeh <redmine@...> 2008/07/14

Issue #276 has been updated by Matthew Boeh.

[#17771] 1.9.0-2 doesn't have parallel makefile fixes — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

looks like it didn't get merged over?

2 messages 2008/07/14
[#17780] Re: 1.9.0-2 doesn't have parallel makefile fixes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17785] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #277] (Open) 1.9/trunk: build broken in ruby/ruby.h — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Issue #277 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.

4 messages 2008/07/15
[#17786] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #277] 1.9/trunk: build broken in ruby/ruby.h — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2008/07/15

Issue #277 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.
[#17787] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #277] 1.9/trunk: build broken in ruby/ruby.h — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/07/15

Hello,
[#17792] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #277] 1.9/trunk: build broken in ruby/ruby.h — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2008/07/15

Issue #277 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.

[#17799] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #278] (Open) segmentation fault on regexp — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #278 has been reported by Anonymous.

3 messages 2008/07/16
[#25550] [Bug #278](Rejected) segmentation fault on regexp — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #278 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#17826] Re: [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #278] (Open) segmentation fault on regexp — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/18

Hi,

[#17810] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #281] (Open) Time.parse does not throw ArgumentError on all invalid arguments — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #281 has been reported by Anonymous.

1 message 2008/07/16

[#17811] IRHG -- MISSING IN ACTION — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/07/16

[#17812] Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Sorry for not noticing sooner. It occurs to me that the built-in

6 messages 2008/07/17
[#17816] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/17

It seems to me what you need is not a coverage system but a general hook
[#17818] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/07/17

I just looked at the code to set the coverage hash and it seems to
[#17819] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/07/17

Hi Rocky,
[#17820] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/07/17

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:21 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
[#17821] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/07/17

Sorry again. I almost wrote this but I would like to be more explicit.

[#17813] Call for Talks - 8th. Jornadas Regionales de Software Libre — "Matias Pablo Brutti" <matiasbrutti@...>

SGksCgpTb3JyeSBhYm91dCB0aGUgc3BhbmlzaCBmcm9tIGJlbG93IGJ1dCB0aGUgbWVldGluZyBp

1 message 2008/07/17

[#17814] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #281] (Rejected) Time.parse does not throw ArgumentError on all invalid arguments — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>

Issue #281 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

1 message 2008/07/17

[#17822] rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/07/17
[#17823] Re: rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/17

On Jul 17, 2008, at 08:39 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#17830] Re: rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/07/18

2008/7/18 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:
[#17844] Re: rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/18

On Jul 18, 2008, at 03:56 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
[#17856] Re: rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/07/19

2008/7/19 Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net>:

[#17824] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #286] (Open) open-uri leaking file handles — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #286 has been reported by Anonymous.

7 messages 2008/07/18
[#17825] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #286] (Open) open-uri leaking file handles — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/18

Hi,
[#17836] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #286] open-uri leaking file handles — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/07/18

Issue #286 has been updated by Anonymous.
[#17837] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #286] open-uri leaking file handles — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2008/07/18

Issue #286 has been updated by Anonymous.
[#19706] [Bug #286] open-uri leaking file handles — Elliot Temple <redmine@...> 2008/11/05

Issue #286 has been updated by Elliot Temple.
[#23388] [Bug #286] open-uri leaking file handles — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2009/05/07

Issue #286 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#25545] [Bug #286](Closed) open-uri leaking file handles — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #286 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#17829] FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

9 messages 2008/07/18
[#17838] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/18

C.E. Thornton wrote:
[#17841] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/18

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17847] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/07/18

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 04:27:09AM +0900, C.E. Thornton wrote:
[#17848] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/18

Matthew,
[#17849] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/07/19

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 08:58:42AM +0900, C.E. Thornton wrote:
[#17850] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/19

OK, maybe I am going about things wrong.
[#17859] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — Rune Hammersland <rune@...> 2008/07/19

On 19. juli. 2008, at 03:04, Matthew Boeh wrote:
[#17863] Re: FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/19

Thanks, both you and Matthew Boeh have pointed

[#17833] Object allocation tracking — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Please excuse the blog spam.

5 messages 2008/07/18
[#17862] Re: Object allocation tracking — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/07/19

Christopher Thompson wrote:
[#17932] Re: Object allocation tracking — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...> 2008/07/23

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#17925] Re: Object allocation tracking — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/07/23

There was already a patch available about the same subject:
[#17933] Re: Object allocation tracking — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...> 2008/07/23

Sylvain Joyeux wrote:

[#17834] Tested expand_path failure with 1.8.7 --- Same Results — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/07/18

[#17835] 1.9 (2008-02-09) also fails expand_path() test! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

TEST 1

1 message 2008/07/18

[#17839] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #337] (Open) xmlrpc/client.rb is missing webrick library — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #337 has been reported by Anonymous.

4 messages 2008/07/18
[#17845] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #337] xmlrpc/client.rb is missing webrick library — James Gray <redmine@...> 2008/07/18

Issue #337 has been updated by James Gray.
[#17846] Re: [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #337] (Open) xmlrpc/client.rb is missing webrick library — James Gray <james@...> 2008/07/18

On Jul 18, 2008, at 1:34 PM, Anonymous wrote:
[#25547] [Bug #337](Closed) xmlrpc/client.rb is missing webrick library — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #337 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#17842] Patch for expand_path fix --- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/07/18

[#17843] Exapand_path Patch good as stands. — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/07/18

[#17854] rdoc test uses hardcoded /tmp. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>

test/rdoc/test_rdoc_info_formatting.rb uses /tmp/rdoc-$$.

2 messages 2008/07/19
[#17907] Re: rdoc test uses hardcoded /tmp. — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/21

On Jul 19, 2008, at 01:42 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#17861] fyi: ruby-debug broken by svn rev 17702 in p252 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

I get this error in latest patchlevel 289 of ruby 1.8.6

1 message 2008/07/19

[#17864] Re: fyi: ruby-debug broken by svn rev 17702 in p252 — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

I believe Kent Sibilev has fixed this in the current SVN sources for

2 messages 2008/07/19
[#17867] Re: fyi: ruby-debug broken by svn rev 17702 in p252 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/07/20

At 5:03 AM +0900 7/20/08, Rocky Bernstein wrote:

[#17865] Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

8 messages 2008/07/19
[#17870] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/20

Hi,
[#17874] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/20

[#17929] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/23

Hi,
[#17934] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/07/23

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:52:54AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17935] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/23

Matthew Boeh wrote:
[#17936] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/23

Hi,
[#17937] Re: Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/24

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#17866] Expand_path: Can someone point me a doc on regression test Ruby! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

I would like to find documentation on running

1 message 2008/07/19

[#17868] command files — Likon <likon@...>

2 messages 2008/07/20
[#17876] Re: command files — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/07/20

Likon wrote:

[#17871] duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>

While nil is an object, calling dup on it causes TypeError. This doesnt seem

33 messages 2008/07/20
[#17872] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Nasir Khan wrote:
[#17873] Re: duping the NilClass — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/07/20

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
[#17877] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Meinrad Recheis wrote:
[#17879] Re: duping the NilClass — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17880] Re: duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...> 2008/07/21

I write a lot of hand crafted dup or clone because I want control as well as
[#17881] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --
[#17882] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/21

+1 to David. A convenient way to do Marshal idiom should be a new
[#17885] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17887] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --
[#17889] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17891] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/21

Robert Dober wrote:
[#17911] Re: duping the NilClass — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/22

At 23:51 08/07/21, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#17912] Re: duping the NilClass — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/07/22

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
[#17894] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --
[#17895] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:18 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17896] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

ERRATUM
[#17897] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Robert Dober wrote:
[#17904] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:58 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17905] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --
[#17908] Re: duping the NilClass — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/21

On Jul 21, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Robert Dober wrote:
[#17909] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17884] Re: duping the NilClass — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/21

David A. Black wrote (and Shohei Urabe supported):
[#17886] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --
[#17890] Re: duping the NilClass — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/21

[#17893] Re: duping the NilClass — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/21

[#17898] Re: duping the NilClass — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/21

[#17900] Re: duping the NilClass — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/07/21

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#17901] Re: duping the NilClass — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/07/21

On Jul 21, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#17903] Re: duping the NilClass — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/07/21

[#17878] Re: duping the NilClass — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/20

Meinrad Recheis wrote:
[#17888] Re: duping the NilClass — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/21

[#17902] Re: duping the NilClass — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/21

[#17883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] (Open) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Issue #340 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.

14 messages 2008/07/21
[#18998] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #340 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#21563] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — john harrison <redmine@...> 2009/01/26

Issue #340 has been updated by john harrison.
[#21801] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2009/02/03

Issue #340 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.
[#17959] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2008/07/25

Issue #340 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.
[#19041] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...> 2008/09/30

Issue #340 has been updated by Ollivier Robert.
[#19046] Re: [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/30

Hi,
[#29691] [Bug #340](Third Party's Issue) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #340 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29699] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #340 has been updated by Jon Forums.
[#29700] Re: [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/21

2010/4/22 Jon Forums <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#29703] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #340 has been updated by Jon Forums.
[#29714] Re: [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...> 2010/04/22

Hi,
[#29704] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/04/21

Issue #340 has been updated by Jon Forums.
[#29724] [Bug #340] 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Jon Forums <redmine@...> 2010/04/22

Issue #340 has been updated by Jon Forums.

[#17899] Downloading Latest Ruby's — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

2 messages 2008/07/21
[#17906] Re: Downloading Latest Ruby's — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/21

Hi,

[#17913] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #342] (Open) [PATCH] REXML Pretty Formatter's private method wrap breaks if no space is found — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #342 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/07/22
[#18838] [Bug #342](Closed) [PATCH] REXML Pretty Formatter's private method wrap breaks if no space is found — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/24

Issue #342 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#17914] — jhz <liangyin@...>

unsubscribe

1 message 2008/07/22

[#17915] select returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

6 messages 2008/07/22
[#17916] Re: select returning an enumerator — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/07/22

David A. Black wrote:
[#17919] Re: select returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/22

Hi --
[#17921] Re: select returning an enumerator — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/07/22

David A. Black wrote:
[#17917] Re: select returning an enumerator — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/07/22

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com>
[#17920] Re: select returning an enumerator — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/07/22

Meinrad Recheis wrote:

[#17918] String methods on subclasses return "uninitialized" objects — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/22

[#17922] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #345] (Open) 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Issue #345 has been reported by Roger Pack.

7 messages 2008/07/22
[#18118] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #345] (Closed) 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/04

Issue #345 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#18171] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #345] 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #345 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#18189] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #345] 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/08

Hi,
[#19192] [Bug #345] 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/08

Issue #345 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#19193] Re: [Bug #345] 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/10/08

[#19199] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug] super in extension library and ruby script — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/10/08

Hi,

[#17924] Re: String methods on subclasses return "uninitialized" objects — gdefty@...

Vladimir,

1 message 2008/07/23

[#17926] Expand_path Bug: HOW to report a bug and a patch to fix it! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/07/23
[#17927] Re: Expand_path Bug: HOW to report a bug and a patch to fix it! — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/23

The new Ruby bug tracker is here:
[#17928] Re: Expand_path Bug: HOW to report a bug and a patch to fix it! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/23

Vladimir,

[#17943] RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

56 messages 2008/07/24
[#17949] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/25

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17950] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/25

In article <3454c9680807241200xf7cc766qb987905a3987bb78@mail.gmail.com>,
[#17951] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/07/25

[#17952] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/07/25

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
[#17957] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
[#17962] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/25

In article <3454c9680807250045q6d3ecbe8n2692c899dc62a94a@mail.gmail.com>,
[#17967] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17963] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/25

On 25/07/2008, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#17976] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/25

On Jul 25, 2008, at 01:23 AM, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#17958] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17981] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/26

In article <3454c9680807250054i70db563duf44b42d92ba41bfb@mail.gmail.com>,
[#17986] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/26

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#17989] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/07/27

[#17994] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/27

On 27/07/2008, Brian Ford <brixen@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17998] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/27

Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#18013] RUBY_BUILD, too? Re: Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/29

[#18018] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/07/29

On 27/07/2008, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#17990] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Brian Ford <brixen@...> 2008/07/27

On Jul 26, 2:04=A0am, "Luis Lavena" <luislav...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17991] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "brian ford" <brixen@...> 2008/07/27

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17999] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/27

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#18021] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/30

In article <488CCF46.6000806@sun.com>,
[#18025] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/30

Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#18002] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/27

Hi,
[#18020] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/30

In article <3454c9680807271330pd68dc2agdc76554a5482dcaa@mail.gmail.com>,
[#18022] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/30

On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#18026] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/30

Hi,
[#18027] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/30

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#17961] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/25

[#17966] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi Bill,
[#17997] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/27

ruby_install_name could be ruby1.8 if the install name is different than
[#17975] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/25

On Jul 25, 2008, at 01:21 AM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#17977] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/25

[#17978] Determining ruby's location (Was: RUBY_ENGINE?) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/07/25

On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#18000] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/27

Bill Kelly wrote:
[#18019] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/30

[#18108] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/03

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#18107] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/03

So where do we stand on this? I'm still convinced RUBY_ENGINE is needed,
[#18284] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/14

Since this thread seemed to die out, I'll ask again:
[#18287] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/14

Hi,
[#18289] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/14

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18295] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/14

Hi,
[#18296] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/08/14

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18302] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/14

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18290] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Curt Hagenlocher <curth@...> 2008/08/14

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org]
[#18304] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/08/14

[#18001] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/07/27

Hi all.
[#18003] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/27

Hi,
[#18014] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/29

At 10:55 08/07/28, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
[#18004] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/07/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18005] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/07/27

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#18006] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/07/27

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#18007] Merging Ruby Enterprise Edition [Was: Re: RUBY_ENGINE?] — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/07/27

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#18009] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/07/28

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Hongli Lai <hongli@plan99.net> wrote:
[#18011] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/28

Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
[#18023] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/07/30

Exactly. This constant would've been infinitely helpful to a project

[#17944] ruby 1.9 build error: rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error (sp: 36, bp: 34) — Chris <cschlaeger@...>

I'm trying to build SVN head on an openSUSE 11.0 AMD64 system.

1 message 2008/07/24

[#17954] Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

HI,

11 messages 2008/07/25
[#17956] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,
[#17996] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/07/27

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18188] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18190] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/08

Hi,
[#18191] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18192] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18195] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18196] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/08

Hi,
[#18198] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18194] Re: Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/08

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#17970] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #362] (Open) Signal handling meets threading — Stanislav Senotrusov <redmine@...>

Issue #362 has been reported by Stanislav Senotrusov.

2 messages 2008/07/25
[#25548] [Bug #362](Closed) Signal handling meets threading — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #362 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#17972] Patching MRI for a larger stack? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>

I've been running the Ruby Benchmark Suite, and a couple of the

3 messages 2008/07/25
[#17979] Re: Patching MRI for a larger stack? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/26

Hi,
[#17980] Re: Patching MRI for a larger stack? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/26

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:07 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#17973] Proposal of GC::Profiler — Narihiro Nakamura <authorNari@...>

Hi.

10 messages 2008/07/25
[#17974] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/25

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 23:59 +0900, Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[#17982] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — "Daniel Luz" <dev@...> 2008/07/26

Good idea. My only immediate suggestion is...
[#17983] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2008/07/26

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Daniel Luz <dev@mernen.com> wrote:
[#17984] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/07/26

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 13:17 +0900, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
[#17988] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — Narihiro Nakamura <authorNari@...> 2008/07/26

Thank you for the many opinion.
[#18285] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/14

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#17995] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/07/27

For the sake of the integration of development tools, would it not be better to
[#18032] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — authorNari <authornari@...> 2008/07/31

Hi
[#18253] Re: Proposal of GC::Profiler — "Narihiro Nakamura" <authornari@...> 2008/08/12

Hi.

[#17985] — "luo ian" <ianluo63@...>

unsubscribe

1 message 2008/07/26

[#17993] Hex string literals [Patch] — gdefty@...

Although a string in Ruby is defined as a sequence

1 message 2008/07/27

[#18008] Improving the metaprogramming facilities of Ruby. — Daniel Pittman <daniel@...>

3 messages 2008/07/28
[#18010] Re: Improving the metaprogramming facilities of Ruby. — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/28

Hi --
[#18012] Re: Improving the metaprogramming facilities of Ruby. — Daniel Pittman <daniel@...> 2008/07/28

"David A. Black" <dblack@rubypal.com> writes:

[#18015] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #371] (Open) sleep() longer than expected, ruby 1.8.7, windows XP — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #371 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/07/29
[#18030] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #371] (Closed) sleep() longer than expected, ruby 1.8.7, windows XP — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/07/31

Issue #371 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18016] Re: Hex string literals [Patch] — gdefty@...

Before posting the message below I thought long

4 messages 2008/07/29
[#18017] Re: Hex string literals [Patch] — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/07/29

Hi,
[#18024] Re: Hex string literals [Patch] — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/07/30

The main time when I get to use hex is for testing.
[#18028] Re: Hex string literals [Patch] — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/30

Hi,

[#18029] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #378] (Open) rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #378 has been reported by Anonymous.

5 messages 2008/07/30
[#18163] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #378] rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — Thibault Normand <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #378 has been updated by Thibault Normand.
[#18365] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #378] (Open) rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/08/21

Hi,
[#18366] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #378] (Open) rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — "Chris Schlaeger" <cschlaeger@...> 2008/08/22

Thanks for tracing this down! The bug has been fixed in the Novell gcc
[#18367] [Bug #378](Closed) rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/22

Issue #378 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18031] RDoc does not support the private comment for class etc in C Extension. — Takao Kouji <kouji@...7.net>

Hi,

1 message 2008/07/31

[#18033] JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

In order to limit or reduce the likelihood that multiple threads

5 messages 2008/07/31
[#18034] Re: JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/31

Hi,
[#18035] Re: JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/07/31

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18054] Re: JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/08/01

On 7/31/08, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#18055] Re: JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/08/01

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:

[ruby-core:17813] Call for Talks - 8th. Jornadas Regionales de Software Libre

From: "Matias Pablo Brutti" <matiasbrutti@...>
Date: 2008-07-17 01:21:35 UTC
List: ruby-core #17813 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In This Thread

Prev Next