[#17480] Array#fill behavior — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#17488] HOME and USERPROFILE aliasing under Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>
MRI currently expects the HOME environment variable to be set under Windows=
[#17491] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #213] (Open) Different ERB behavior across versions — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Issue #213 has been reported by Federico Builes.
[#17503] Possible misbehaviour in mkmf.rb package — S駻gio Durigan J佖ior <sergiodj@...>
Hello all,
On Wednesday 02 July 2008, S駻gio Durigan J佖ior wrote:
[#17509] YAML in Ruby — Trans <transfire@...>
Might we ever imagine a time when YAML is an integral part of Ruby?
[#17518] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #216] (Open) Memory leaks in 1.8.6p230 and p238 — Igal Koshevoy <redmine@...>
Issue #216 has been reported by Igal Koshevoy.
[#17566] rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...>
I've put together a shell script that runs checks on a Ruby interpreter.
Why not write it in ruby?
Kurt Stephens wrote:
I've split up the code of rubychecker. One git repo has the GNU Bash
[#17574] rubyspec reports for ruby_1_8, ruby_1_8_7, and v1_8_6_p265 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
I wanted to learn more about specs recently started using git and so
Stephen Bannasch wrote:
[#17595] Crashes and hangups on latest 1_8 branch — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#17609] [PATCH] Fix Makefile update-rubyspec task — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>
Hi, I'm trying to run rubyspec tests on 1.8 branch and get this error:
[#17615] [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>
At the moment, ruby-mode.el uses font-lock-keywords as opposed to
It was designed to fix the following case:
Here's a third patch that fixes a bug in the second and uses a quicker
One more patch which fixes a few bugs in the the last one.
Hi,
Looks like version 22 doesn't support explicitly numbered regexp groups.
Hi,
Hi,
Alright, here's a version that fixes both the highlighting bug and the
Hi,
Are you asking me? If so, go right ahead. Also, for posterity's sake,
One more bugfix.
Hi,
[#17627] ncurses-specific functions in ruby's curses — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
Is it possible to add ncurses-specific functions to curses ruby module?
On Sunday 06 July 2008, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Marc Haisenko wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17629] Proper exception out of throw? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#17644] Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all
Dave Thomas wrote:
There are two things I would like to see added to 1.9.1. A one-byte
Hi,
Hi,
In article <E1KGF2L-0000Qx-K5@x61.netlab.jp>,
Hi,
[#17674] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] (Open) Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...>
Issue #238 has been reported by Jim Deville.
[#17690] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #249] (Open) wish list item: binding.set_local_variable — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Issue #249 has been reported by Roger Pack.
[#17694] Mark functions not called on exit — Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
Hi everyone,
Hi,
[#17699] Omissions on the ruby-lang.org website and in redmine — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
As far as I can tell, there's nowhere on the ruby-lang.org website
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, James Gray <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#17708] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>
Issue #252 has been reported by Ryan Davis.
Issue #252 has been updated by Vladimir Sizikov.
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#17759] Ruby 1.9.1 Feature and 1.9.0-3 release plan — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Thank you for your replies to [ruby-core:17644]. < all
[#17785] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #277] (Open) 1.9/trunk: build broken in ruby/ruby.h — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>
Issue #277 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.
[#17812] Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>
Sorry for not noticing sooner. It occurs to me that the built-in
It seems to me what you need is not a coverage system but a general hook
I just looked at the code to set the coverage hash and it seems to
Hi Rocky,
[#17822] rdoc defines Hash#method_missing — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#17829] FAILURE of "expand_path" — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
C.E. Thornton wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 04:27:09AM +0900, C.E. Thornton wrote:
[#17833] Object allocation tracking — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>
Please excuse the blog spam.
[#17843] Exapand_path Patch good as stands. — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
[#17865] Expand_Path: New Patch - Modified Processing — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Hi,
[#17871] duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>
While nil is an object, calling dup on it causes TypeError. This doesnt seem
Nasir Khan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
Meinrad Recheis wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
I write a lot of hand crafted dup or clone because I want control as well as
Hi --
+1 to David. A convenient way to do Marshal idiom should be a new
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi --
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
Hi --
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:18 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#17883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] (Open) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>
Issue #340 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.
[#17915] select returning an enumerator — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#17922] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #345] (Open) 1.9 racc appears to seg fault — Roger Pack <redmine@...>
Issue #345 has been reported by Roger Pack.
[#17943] RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
In article <3454c9680807241200xf7cc766qb987905a3987bb78@mail.gmail.com>,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
Hi,
In article <3454c9680807250054i70db563duf44b42d92ba41bfb@mail.gmail.com>,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
Hi,
Since this thread seemed to die out, I'll ask again:
Hi,
Hi all.
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17954] Expand_path -- Proposal: An alternate method — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
HI,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#17973] Proposal of GC::Profiler — Narihiro Nakamura <authorNari@...>
Hi.
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 23:59 +0900, Narihiro Nakamura wrote:
[#18016] Re: Hex string literals [Patch] — gdefty@...
Before posting the message below I thought long
[#18029] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #378] (Open) rbconfig.rb:173: [BUG] Stack consistency error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #378 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18033] JRuby adding ConcurrencyError for fatal concurrent modification — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
In order to limit or reduce the likelihood that multiple threads
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[ruby-core:17816] Re: Tracing versus coverage (was Re: Re: Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1)
It seems to me what you need is not a coverage system but a general hook interface. That can be useful, bot should better be another infrastructure than the coverage feature we have now. Rocky Bernstein wrote: > Sorry for not noticing sooner. It occurs to me that the built-in > coverage feature that is currently being implemented for the next > release is not all that different from a line tracing feature. I > wonder if it could be extended so that a method is called instead of > updating a hash. In fact one can think of the coverage mechanism as a > special kind of trace mechanism that only updates a hash. > > And it's also true that the instruction replacement for setting a > (temporary) breakpoint in 1.9 can also be used in implementing > something like rcov. > > Here you set temporary breakpoints at every known statement boundary. > If all you care about is coverage like rcov after the temporary > breakpoint is serviced by updating a mark indicating the line was hit, > the original opcode can go back and in terms of performance the only > penalty is the initial time to put in the temporary breakpoints and > the time to update however many counts are actually covered. > > And one can reliably know what has not been run by scanning the code > for trace instructions. Finally, I suppose all of this could be sped > up by building initial trace replacement into the compiler. > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2008/7/8 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yugui@yugui.jp>: >> >>> Committers and anyone who intend to write patches, let me know your >>> plan. What features will be implemented by 25 Sep? What will not? >>> >> I hope to include built-in coverage measurement feature. >> >> I have already committed some primitive features that measure >> coverage into the core interpreter. But I haven't implemented >> a practical front-end tool which controls measurement and outputs >> the measured result. >> >> As a matter of fact, my goal is to measure coverage of the >> standard libraries for maintenance and enhancement of their tests, >> not to provide useful coverage measurement tool. So I'm not in a >> hurry to implement a front-end tool. If it's permitted, let's >> just say that it will be implemented by 1.9.5 :-) >> >> -- >> Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> >> >> >> > > > >