[#17566] rubychecker - runs checks on a Ruby interpreter — Igal Koshevoy <igal@...>

I've put together a shell script that runs checks on a Ruby interpreter.

14 messages 2008/07/03

[#17615] [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>

At the moment, ruby-mode.el uses font-lock-keywords as opposed to

22 messages 2008/07/05
[#17657] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/07/08

[#17678] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/09

It was designed to fix the following case:

[#17755] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/13

Here's a third patch that fixes a bug in the second and uses a quicker

[#17772] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

One more patch which fixes a few bugs in the the last one.

[#17773] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17776] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Looks like version 22 doesn't support explicitly numbered regexp groups.

[#17779] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17783] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/15

Hi,

[#17788] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/07/15

Alright, here's a version that fixes both the highlighting bug and the

[#17793] Re: [PATCH] ruby-mode.el: Fix here-doc strings with inner quotes — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/07/16

Hi,

[#17644] Features to be included in Ruby 1.9.1 — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all

27 messages 2008/07/08

[#17674] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #238] (Open) Ruby doesn't respect the Windows read-only flag — Jim Deville <redmine@...>

Issue #238 has been reported by Jim Deville.

10 messages 2008/07/08

[#17708] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] (Open) Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=> — Ryan Davis <redmine@...>

Issue #252 has been reported by Ryan Davis.

13 messages 2008/07/09

[#17871] duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...>

While nil is an object, calling dup on it causes TypeError. This doesnt seem

33 messages 2008/07/20
[#17872] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Nasir Khan wrote:

[#17873] Re: duping the NilClass — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/07/20

On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>

[#17877] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/20

Meinrad Recheis wrote:

[#17879] Re: duping the NilClass — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/07/20

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:

[#17880] Re: duping the NilClass — "Nasir Khan" <rubylearner@...> 2008/07/21

I write a lot of hand crafted dup or clone because I want control as well as

[#17881] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17882] Re: duping the NilClass — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/07/21

+1 to David. A convenient way to do Marshal idiom should be a new

[#17885] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#17887] Re: duping the NilClass — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/07/21

Hi --

[#17889] Re: duping the NilClass — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/07/21

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#17883] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #340] (Open) 1.9/trunk does not work when compiled with llvm-gcc4 2.3 (gcc 4.2.1) — Ollivier Robert <redmine@...>

Issue #340 has been reported by Ollivier Robert.

14 messages 2008/07/21

[#17943] RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

56 messages 2008/07/24
[#17950] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/25

In article <3454c9680807241200xf7cc766qb987905a3987bb78@mail.gmail.com>,

[#17958] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/07/25

Hi,

[#17981] Re: RUBY_ENGINE? — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/07/26

In article <3454c9680807250054i70db563duf44b42d92ba41bfb@mail.gmail.com>,

[ruby-core:17781] Re: Mark functions not called on exit

From: Charlie Savage <cfis@...>
Date: 2008-07-15 05:44:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #17781
Hi Brent,

>>From your description below, I believe the fundamental problem might that
> the XML document "nodes" in the Node::Set are not Ruby objects.  Because
> of this, the garbage collector cannot see that XML::Node:Set has a
> dependency
> on the parent XML::Document.

Correct.

> It would probably be sufficient to add a pointer to the base of the
> parent XML::Document to
> the XML::Node::Set being returned by Document#find, even if this object
> reference
> were not otherwise necessary.   Having the object reference in the
> XML::Node::Set
> should prevent the garbage collector from freeing an XML::Document
> before any XML::Node::Set
> referring to it.

No, that's not the issue.  The XML::Node::Set object already has a mark 
function that tells the GC that it is dependent on the document.

The issue is that at shutdown, Ruby calls free functions in an 
undetermined order.  Doesn't matter what object graphs have been set up 
(at least that is how I interpret Nobu's reply:

http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/vframe.rb/ruby/ruby-core/17745?17500-17776+split-mode-vertical

> 
> Anyway, to fix this "the ruby way", think in terms of a the Ruby object
> dependency
> graph.  Pointers to anything that is not wrapped up as a Ruby object
> will not be
> respected as a dependency by the conservative Ruby garbage collector.

The only fix I see is the XML::Node::Set to register itself with the 
XML::Document (this is in C code).  Then when document_free gets called, 
the document checks to see if any XML::Node::Sets are about, and calls 
their free function.  Of course, that has to be noted by the 
XML::Node::Sets because Ruby is going to come along in another 
millisecond calling its free function again.  All fairly ugly.

Thus my hope that Ruby could do a mark/sweep before shutting down.  But 
I'm sure that introduces its own issues (not too mention slowing down 
shutdown).

Thanks for your thoughts....

Charlie

Attachments (1)

smime.p7s (3.16 KB, application/x-pkcs7-signature)

In This Thread

Prev Next