[#17055] Set#map! vs. map — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 10:13:07 +0900,
At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 13:39:10 +0900,
Hi --
At Tue, 3 Jun 2008 18:03:23 +0900,
[#17067] Eval'ing 'yield' in 1.8 and 1.9 — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#17069] Ruby on zLinux — "Eric K. Dickinson" <eric.dickinson@...>
I posted this on the Ruby-Talk list with no success.
[#17084] Enumerable::Enumerator#with_memo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
Akinori MUSHA wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:11 PM, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
Martin DeMello wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:04 AM, David Flanagan
David Flanagan wrote:
[#17092] Iconv#iconv(str, start, length) doesn't really convert str[start, length] — Vincent <vincentlu@...>
Hi Core,
Hi Core,
Hi,
[#17106] r16747: This commit and comment are real? — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
Checking a feed of the changes in ruby repository found this:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17116] Standardizing RUBY_PLATFORM — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
On Jun 4, 8:52=A0pm, Brian Ford <bri...@gmail.com> wrote:
[#17126] remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
I wrote a patch to remove ObjectSpace.each_object from test/unit.
[#17155] lambda { break } — ts <decoux@...>
Hi,
[#17161] Ruby 1.8.7-p17 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
[#17162] Release Plan: Ruby 1.9.0-2 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> writes:
I have to agree, on the documentation side.
SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#17167] Mail count in Subject — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...>
Hi!
All,
Warren Brown wrote:
At 11:54 08/06/10, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17186] REXML Separation — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...>
Hello,
[#17261] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #161] (Open) Profile library seems broken in 1.9 15427cat t.rv — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Issue #161 has been reported by Dave Thomas.
[#17272] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #167] (Open) net/telnet login() method no longer works under 1.9 — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>
Issue #167 has been reported by Dave Thomas.
On Jun 15, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Dave Thomas wrote:
Yes, indeed it does...
[#17283] Major change in 1.8.6: convert_type now uses private conversion methods too — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
Hi,
[#17291] miniruby dependencies broken in 1.9 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I've been having builds break with -j 4. This should add $(PREP) to
Hi,
[#17293] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #175] (Open) Rational#power2 raises a NameError or causes infinite loops when passed a Rational — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>
Issue #175 has been reported by Arthur Schreiber.
[#17310] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #178] (Open) File.open on sprintf-formatted string fails with encoding conversion error on OS X — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>
Issue #178 has been reported by Eric Hodel.
Issue #178 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#17327] A plea for a release process — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
Hello,
On Jun 18, 1:12=A0pm, "U.Nakamura" <u...@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#17345] Understanding the output of Kernel#caller — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...>
I am trying to understand what Ruby 1.8 outputs when "caller" is invoked.
[#17353] patches for tests of rubygems — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Jun 24, 2008, at 05:55 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#17356] A faster Array#delete — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
Hi all,
[#17377] Re: Ruby 1.9.0/1.8.7/1.8.6/1.8.5 new releases (Security Fix) — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...>
Hi,
[#17392] XMLRPC socket patch — Dario Meloni <mellon85@...>
Hi,
[#17393] URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk — "Igal Koshevoy" <igal@...>
All currently available versions of MRI Ruby are either vulnerable to
Sorry for a late reply but I think I've fixed this issue. Can someone
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hello, I think current 1.8.6/1.8.7 is stable than p230/p22, so I decided
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hello,
Hi Urabe,
Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On 7/3/08, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
On 02/07/2008, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> wrote:
In article <a5d587fb0807160533r4534fabdg257b4a9523b15f1e@mail.gmail.com>,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:18:05PM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:43:46AM +0900, Federico Builes wrote:
When will we see a new 1.8.6 release?
Hi,
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 02:04:15AM +0900, Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 04:35:43AM +0900, Jeremy Henty wrote:
Jeremy,
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
Hi,
When can we expect a release?
Hi Vladimir, hi Urabe,
Thank you, I merged this revision into 1.8.7.
Hi,
In article <48662E99.7030508@pragmaticraft.com>,
Federico Builes wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <48678E3D.8020602@pragmaticraft.com>,
Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <4867A6AC.4060902@pragmaticraft.com>,
[#17412] Time for a release management committee? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>
It seems like recent problems with patchlevel and minor 1.8 releases
[#17427] 1.8 release management — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 06:06:14PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Let me describe some simple questions about Ruby 1.8.6 that are not
For what I know,
On 6/30/08, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
Luis Lavena wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Igal Koshevoy wrote:
Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hi,
Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Igal Koshevoy <igal@pragmaticraft.com> wrote:
[ruby-core:17438] Re: URGENT: Possible fixes for segfaults and vulnerabilities available for review in ruby-talk
Urabe Shyouhei wrote: > Igal Koshevoy wrote: > >> For the sake of protecting Ruby's good image, I believe it's necessary >> to ship an *official* version that's compatible and addresses these >> vulnerabilities as soon as possible. After that's shipped, resolving >> the matter with the API changes in the current code will likely be a >> priority. If there's anything that we in the Ruby community can help >> you with, please ask. :) >> > > Yes. Please write a patch :) > I'll try to help with the Ruby patches, but I don't know C well enough to offer assistance. > I know you all need a stable Ruby, rather than abeautifully working Ruby. I love Ruby because it's beautiful. But the people that pay me don't care about beauty, only stability. :/ > But honestly I'm doubtful for urgency of current situation. If things > are that dangerous someone might be writing patches, like some people > did for p230. I think p230 was dangerous enough. But now that fixes > are made, it seems it's less urgent. Please release an official fix and soon. The urgency is that it's now been 9 days and there's no official solution to the vulnerabilities reported and the segmentation faults in p230. Ruby user's options for resolving this currently are very problematic. They either must scour websites and mailing lists for patches, and personally decide which of these complex unofficial patches to use, which is far beyond most people's ability. Meanwhile, many OS vendors have lost patience and are now beginning to ship patched versions, but they're also making guesses about how to patch this. The Ruby community and distros are waiting for an *official* release that provides a solution to these problems. Although p238 breaks some things, it's better than the officially-released p230 version. This p238 may be worth releasing because it addresses the immediate problems with that failed release and passes the Rails and RSpec test suites just as well as the Ubuntu patched p111 version that I was comparing it to. But please note that I can't evaluate the C code, so I'm entirely depending on your judgment about whether it's ready. Depending on how long it takes to address the compatibility issues uncovered by RubySpec, it may make sense to ship p238 now and ship another release with the compatibility fixes as soon as they're ready. -igal