[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00355] Re: Bugs in the Tk interface
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
1999-05-27 16:01:58 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #355
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:00350] Bugs in the Tk interface"
on 99/05/27, Reimer Behrends <behrends@cse.msu.edu> writes:
|There are a couple of minor bugs in the Tk interface. The enclosed
|patch should take care of them, unless I've overlooked something,
|but the calls seem to work now.
Thank you for the patch. It seems Ok. I'll apply it.
|Also, I think that TkComm::uninstall_cmd() needs to strip the beginning
|"rb_out " from its argument -- otherwise creating a lot of callbacks
|will leak memory. But as I'm not entirely sure about that (I don't
|yet understand the callback interface entirely), I've left it alone
|for the time being.
You're right. I'll put the line:
id = $1 if /rb_out (c\d+)/
before removing id from Tk_CMDTBL. Thank you so much.
matz.