[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#331] module-class calling — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi...
5 messages
1999/05/22
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
1999-05-17 06:56:27 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #315
In message "[ruby-talk:00314] Arity features for Proc object?"
on 99/05/17, Pros Yeboah <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> writes:
|Would it be possible to add arity feature to the Proc object.
|So that one could easily determine the required args for a user passed
|Proc in a function.
Hmm, what is ARITY? Does somebody know that word in Japanese??
Is it the feature to determin whether a proc requires arguments? Or
the feature to retrieve the argument information (number, names,
type)?
I think the former is possible, the latter is ... I don't know. I'm
sure the latter is very hard even if possible.
matz.