[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#331] module-class calling — "Michael Neumann" <neumann@...>
Hi...
5 messages
1999/05/22
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00307] RE: win32ole extension
From:
助田 雅紀 <masaki.suketa@...>
Date:
1999-05-12 04:31:49 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #307
Hello Bryce. I must apologize to you for being late in answering. >I must be screwing something up. It builds the DLL >but I keep getting: > "A device attached to the system is not functioning" I wonder why you keep getting the message. What kind of compiler do you use? >Does anyone have a build of this extension? I checked to work this extension on Visual C++ 5.0. But I checked only static linking, not DLL. I'm sorry for my poor English. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------ Masaki.Suketa<masaki.suketa@systemplaza.co.jp> ------------------------------------------------