[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00314] Arity features for Proc object?
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
1999-05-17 06:46:55 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #314
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list server. So I forward this. ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Return-Path: <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> Sender: yeboah@tu-harburg.de Message-ID: <373FB8ED.B5F05AFF@tu-harburg.de> Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 08:36:30 +0200 From: Pros Yeboah <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> Organization: Student To: ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp Subject: Arity features for Proc object? Hi Matz, Would it be possible to add arity feature to the Proc object. So that one could easily determine the required args for a user passed Proc in a function. It would have been a small but powerful feature . Thanks Pros ------- End of forwarded message -------