[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00332] Re: module-class calling
From:
Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date:
1999-05-22 09:39:39 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #332
At Sat, 22 May 1999 11:14:50 +0200,
Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:
> Following example didn't work! Why?
(snip)
> class B
> def call_A
> include A# error
> A.hello
> end
> end
`include A' must be out of method, and `A.hello' must be rewritten
to `hello' or `self.hello' (because `hello' is an instance method).
class B
include A
def call_A
hello
end
end
Hope this helps,
Shugo