[#300] Ruby 1.3.3-990507 — matz <matz@...>
Ruby 1.3.3-990507 is out, check out:
1 message
1999/05/07
[#314] Arity features for Proc object? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
A mail from <yeboah@tu-harburg.de> is somehow rejected by the list
12 messages
1999/05/17
[#315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
[#316] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00315] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#319] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
1999/05/17
In message "[ruby-talk:00318] Re: Arity features for Proc object?"
[#320] Re: Arity features for Proc object?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
1999/05/17
Hi.
[#323] binding — Pros Yeboah <yeboah@...>
Hi
5 messages
1999/05/18
[#357] thinking aloud — "Bryce Dooley" <thecrow@...>
First off, I think Ruby is a very nice scripting language.
7 messages
1999/05/29
[ruby-talk:00348] Re: Struct.new
From:
Clemens Hintze <cle@...>
Date:
1999-05-26 09:28:38 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #348
On Wed, 26 May 1999, you wrote: >Hi. > >In message "[ruby-talk:00341] Struct.new" > on 99/05/25, "Michael Neumann" <neumann@s-direktnet.de> writes: > Hi too, [...] >Hmm, it's really easy to relax the member check (with included >patch). But I want to discuss whether we should choose this behavior >or not. What do you guys (other than Pros) think about this? > > matz. sorry, no other than Pros :-) I think we should relax it. As I remember a future version of Ruby could have keyword argument passing (hi, matz :-) so that we could decide to call it: s = St.new s = St.new(3) s = St.new(3,4) s = St.new(first:=3) # Syntax not fixed yet! s = St.new(second:=4) # Syntax not fixed yet! s = St.new(first:=3, second:=4) # Syntax not fixed yet! So we would not have to change the behavior in future again, would we? IMHO it should be okay to return nil for members not set. Perhaps a possibility, to give every member explicite a default value if it is not set, would be fine. Just my $0.02 [...] Clemens.