From: 0x0dea+redmine@... Date: 2015-07-10T15:39:10+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:69941] [Ruby trunk - Feature #10594] Numeric#clamp Issue #10594 has been updated by D.E. Akers. Ferdinand Niedermann wrote: > That doesn't really change anything You're right, of course. I'm not sure why I read it as "raise unless `max > min`". The error message is still slightly ill-worded, but everything else looks good. I hope `#clamp` makes it in. The `sort[1]` trick is nice, but it's a little too "clever". ---------------------------------------- Feature #10594: Numeric#clamp https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10594#change-53368 * Author: Chris Johnson * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- This is basically a re-opening of the feature request of issue#4573 (https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4574), which was closed due a naming debate. It seems the standard naming for restricting a number to a specified range is indeed 'clamp'. (1)(2)(3) As such, can we use Yusuke Endoh's original patch with the naming adjustments? If so, I can provide accordingly. Cheers. (1) http://www.rubydoc.info/github/epitron/epitools/Numeric:clamp (2) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12020787/is-there-a-limit-clamp-function-in-ruby (3) https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Standard-Macros.html#CLAMP:CAPS ---Files-------------------------------- num_clamp.c (427 Bytes) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/