[#69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — normalperson@...
Issue #11339 has been reported by Eric Wong.
8 messages
2015/07/07
[#69983] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/15
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#69990] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/07/16
On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
[#69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#69984] $SAFE inside an Array — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2015/07/15
[#70001] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10 — ngotogenome@...
Issue #11336 has been updated by Naohisa Goto.
4 messages
2015/07/16
[#70005] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
Sorry, but I think rb_divert_reserved_fd seems a racy fix. I think the
[#70011] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11362] [Open] [PATCH] ensure Process.kill(:STOP, $$) is resumable — normalperson@...
Issue #11362 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/07/17
[#70016] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg — merch-redmine@...
Issue #11364 has been reported by Jeremy Evans.
8 messages
2015/07/17
[#70052] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/20
merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net wrote:
[#70055] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2015/07/20
On 07/20 10:46, Eric Wong wrote:
[#70056] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/21
Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net> wrote:
[#70103] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11375] Decreased Object Allocation in Pathname.rb — richard.schneeman@...
Issue #11375 has been updated by Richard Schneeman.
3 messages
2015/07/23
[#70156] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11396] Bad performance in ruby >= 2.2 for Hash with many symbol keys — dunric29a@...
Issue #11396 has been updated by David Unric.
3 messages
2015/07/28
[ruby-core:69850] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11326] [Open] Defining a writer as a Struct member allowed?
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2015-07-03 08:21:33 UTC
List:
ruby-core #69850
peter-rl@suschlik.de wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion whether defining a writer member should
> be possible or not.
I suggest banning it (barely-tested patch):
--- a/struct.c
+++ b/struct.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include "internal.h"
#include "vm_core.h"
#include "id.h"
+#include "symbol.h"
/* only for struct[:field] access */
#define AREF_HASH_THRESHOLD (10)
@@ -510,6 +511,10 @@ rb_struct_s_def(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE klass)
rest = rb_ary_tmp_new(argc);
for (i=0; i<argc; i++) {
id = rb_to_id(argv[i]);
+ if (is_attrset_id(id)) {
+ rb_raise(rb_eArgError, "invalid struct member: %+"PRIsVALUE,
+ argv[i]);
+ }
RARRAY_ASET(rest, i, ID2SYM(id));
rb_ary_set_len(rest, i+1);
}
~~~
$ ./ruby -e 'Struct.new(:foo=)'
-e:1:in `new': invalid struct member: :foo= (ArgumentError)
from -e:1:in `<main>'