[#69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — normalperson@...
Issue #11339 has been reported by Eric Wong.
8 messages
2015/07/07
[#69983] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/15
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#69990] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/07/16
On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
[#69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#69984] $SAFE inside an Array — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2015/07/15
[#70001] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10 — ngotogenome@...
Issue #11336 has been updated by Naohisa Goto.
4 messages
2015/07/16
[#70005] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
Sorry, but I think rb_divert_reserved_fd seems a racy fix. I think the
[#70011] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11362] [Open] [PATCH] ensure Process.kill(:STOP, $$) is resumable — normalperson@...
Issue #11362 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/07/17
[#70016] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg — merch-redmine@...
Issue #11364 has been reported by Jeremy Evans.
8 messages
2015/07/17
[#70052] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/20
merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net wrote:
[#70055] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2015/07/20
On 07/20 10:46, Eric Wong wrote:
[#70056] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/21
Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net> wrote:
[#70103] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11375] Decreased Object Allocation in Pathname.rb — richard.schneeman@...
Issue #11375 has been updated by Richard Schneeman.
3 messages
2015/07/23
[#70156] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11396] Bad performance in ruby >= 2.2 for Hash with many symbol keys — dunric29a@...
Issue #11396 has been updated by David Unric.
3 messages
2015/07/28
[ruby-core:69844] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11325] [Rejected] Block is passed to initializer implicitly even when I asked not to.
From:
ruby-core@...
Date:
2015-07-02 13:49:00 UTC
List:
ruby-core #69844
Issue #11325 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
Status changed from Open to Rejected
It may be surprising to you, but this is by design.
You have to explicitly pass an empty block when using `super`:
super(&nil)
There's also no way to change this even if we wanted to because of incompatibilities.
----------------------------------------
Feature #11325: Block is passed to initializer implicitly even when I asked not to.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11325#change-53243
* Author: Andrew Kozin
* Status: Rejected
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
This works as expected:
~~~ruby
class Foo
attr_reader :block
def initialize(&block)
@block = block
end
end
foo = Foo.new { :foo }
foo.block.nil?
# => false
~~~
But then I'm trying to stop passing a block to the superclass' initializer and cannot do this:
~~~ruby
class Bar < Foo
def initialize(&block)
block = nil # added it, however this shouldn't be necessary
yield # nor this one
super() # explicitly asked not to pass the block
end
end
bar = Bar.new { :foo }
bar.block.nil?
# => false (expected true)
~~~
Adding an empty block is not the solution, because what is really needed is **stop passing a block**.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/