[#69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — normalperson@...
Issue #11339 has been reported by Eric Wong.
8 messages
2015/07/07
[#69983] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/15
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#69990] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/07/16
On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
[#69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#69984] $SAFE inside an Array — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2015/07/15
[#70001] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10 — ngotogenome@...
Issue #11336 has been updated by Naohisa Goto.
4 messages
2015/07/16
[#70005] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
Sorry, but I think rb_divert_reserved_fd seems a racy fix. I think the
[#70011] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11362] [Open] [PATCH] ensure Process.kill(:STOP, $$) is resumable — normalperson@...
Issue #11362 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/07/17
[#70016] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg — merch-redmine@...
Issue #11364 has been reported by Jeremy Evans.
8 messages
2015/07/17
[#70052] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/20
merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net wrote:
[#70055] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2015/07/20
On 07/20 10:46, Eric Wong wrote:
[#70056] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/21
Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net> wrote:
[#70103] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11375] Decreased Object Allocation in Pathname.rb — richard.schneeman@...
Issue #11375 has been updated by Richard Schneeman.
3 messages
2015/07/23
[#70156] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11396] Bad performance in ruby >= 2.2 for Hash with many symbol keys — dunric29a@...
Issue #11396 has been updated by David Unric.
3 messages
2015/07/28
[ruby-core:70088] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11388] [Open] SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
From:
e.v.serykh@...
Date:
2015-07-22 16:29:46 UTC
List:
ruby-core #70088
Issue #11388 has been reported by Evgeniy Serykh.
----------------------------------------
Feature #11388: SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/11388
* Author: Evgeniy Serykh
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Considering https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1891 and http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/dsn.html
TD;DR
SMTP session via Telnet:
`R: 220 Pure-Heart.ORG SMTP server here
S: EHLO Pure-Heart.ORG
R: 250-Pure-Heart.ORG
R: 250-DSN
R: 250 SIZE
S: MAIL FROM:<Alice@Pure-Heart.ORG> RET=HDRS ENVID=QQ314159
R: 250 <Alice@Pure-Heart.ORG> sender ok
S: RCPT TO:<Bob@Big-Bucks.COM> NOTIFY=SUCCESS,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822;Bob@Big-Bucks.COM
R: 250 <Bob@Big-Bucks.COM> recipient ok
S: RCPT TO:<Carol@Ivory.EDU> NOTIFY=FAILURE ORCPT=rfc822;Carol@Ivory.EDU
R: 250 <Carol@Ivory.EDU> recipient ok
S: RCPT TO:<Dana@Ivory.EDU> NOTIFY=SUCCESS,FAILURE ORCPT=rfc822;Dana@Ivory.EDU
R: 250 <Eric@Bombs.AF.MIL> recipient ok
S: RCPT TO:<Fred@Bombs.AF.MIL> NOTIFY=NEVER
R: 250 <Fred@Bombs.AF.MIL> recipient ok`
Now **Net::SMTP#rcptto** looks like this:
`
def rcptto(to_addr)
if $SAFE > 0
raise SecurityError, 'tainted to_addr' if to_addr.tainted?
end
getok("RCPT TO:<#{to_addr}>")
end
`
It's impossible to use SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications in current implementation?
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/