[#69892] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API — normalperson@...
Issue #11339 has been reported by Eric Wong.
8 messages
2015/07/07
[#69983] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/15
normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#69990] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2015/07/16
On 2015/07/16 4:41, Eric Wong wrote:
[#69995] Re: [Ruby trunk - Feature #11339] [Open] [PATCH] io.c: avoid kwarg parsing in C API
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#69984] $SAFE inside an Array — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2015/07/15
[#70001] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10 — ngotogenome@...
Issue #11336 has been updated by Naohisa Goto.
4 messages
2015/07/16
[#70005] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11336] [Open] TestProcess#test_exec_fd_3_redirect failed on Solaris 10
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/16
Sorry, but I think rb_divert_reserved_fd seems a racy fix. I think the
[#70011] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11362] [Open] [PATCH] ensure Process.kill(:STOP, $$) is resumable — normalperson@...
Issue #11362 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2015/07/17
[#70016] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg — merch-redmine@...
Issue #11364 has been reported by Jeremy Evans.
8 messages
2015/07/17
[#70052] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/20
merch-redmine@jeremyevans.net wrote:
[#70055] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Jeremy Evans <code@...>
2015/07/20
On 07/20 10:46, Eric Wong wrote:
[#70056] Re: [Ruby trunk - Bug #11364] [Open] Use smaller buffer for sendmsg
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2015/07/21
Jeremy Evans <code@jeremyevans.net> wrote:
[#70103] [Ruby trunk - Feature #11375] Decreased Object Allocation in Pathname.rb — richard.schneeman@...
Issue #11375 has been updated by Richard Schneeman.
3 messages
2015/07/23
[#70156] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11396] Bad performance in ruby >= 2.2 for Hash with many symbol keys — dunric29a@...
Issue #11396 has been updated by David Unric.
3 messages
2015/07/28
[ruby-core:69881] [Ruby trunk - Bug #3351] stack overflow on super
From:
matz@...
Date:
2015-07-06 08:38:05 UTC
List:
ruby-core #69881
Issue #3351 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Agreed.
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Bug #3351: stack overflow on super
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/3351#change-53296
* Author: Serge Balyuk
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Koichi Sasada
* ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-05-26 trunk 28028) [i686-linux]
* Backport:
----------------------------------------
It looks like `super` behavior is a bit different in 1.8 and 1.9. Please find the example below:
```ruby
class Base
def foo
puts "bar"
end
end
module Override
def foo
puts "override"
super
end
end
class A < Base
end
class B < A
end
B.send(:include, Override)
A.send(:include, Override)
B.new.foo
ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i486-linux] output:
override
override
bar
```
and ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-05-26 trunk 28028) [i686-linux] output:
```
....
override
override
override
override
override
super.rb:9: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)
```
Hope that helps.
---Files--------------------------------
super.rb (217 Bytes)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/