[#31647] [Backport #3666] Backport of r26311 (Bug #2587) — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Backport #3666: Backport of r26311 (Bug #2587)

13 messages 2010/08/07

[#31666] [Bug #3677] unable to run certain gem binaries' in windows 7 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #3677: unable to run certain gem binaries' in windows 7

10 messages 2010/08/10

[#31676] [Backport #3680] Splatting calls to_ary instead of to_a in some cases — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...>

Backport #3680: Splatting calls to_ary instead of to_a in some cases

10 messages 2010/08/11

[#31681] [Bug #3683] getgrnam on computer with NIS group (+)? — Rocky Bernstein <redmine@...>

Bug #3683: getgrnam on computer with NIS group (+)?

13 messages 2010/08/11

[#31843] Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...>

This question is no doubt a function of my own lack of understanding, but I think that asking it will at least help some other folks see what's going on with the internals during garbage collection.

17 messages 2010/08/25
[#31861] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/08/26

> The question in short: when an object goes out of scope and has no

[#31862] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...> 2010/08/26

Right - so how does a pointer ever get off the stack?

[#31873] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/08/27

On 8/26/10 11:51 AM, Asher wrote:

[#31894] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...> 2010/08/27

I very much appreciate the response, and this is helpful in describing the narrative, but it's still a few steps behind my question - but it may very well have clarified some points that help us get there.

[#31896] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/08/27

You have introduced something called a "root node" without defining it. What do you mean by this?

[#31885] Avoiding $LOAD_PATH pollution — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Last year Nobu asked me to propose an API for adding an object to

21 messages 2010/08/27

[#31947] not use system for default encoding — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

It strikes me as a bit "scary" to use system locale settings to

19 messages 2010/08/30

[#31971] Change Ruby's License to BSDL + Ruby's dual license — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>

Ruby's License will change to BSDL + Ruby's dual license

16 messages 2010/08/31

[ruby-core:31755] [Bug #3709] Ruby 1.9.1 with openssl 1.0

From: Edmund Highcock <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-08-18 11:29:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #31755
Bug #3709: Ruby 1.9.1 with openssl 1.0
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3709

Author: Edmund Highcock
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: ext, Target version: 1.9.1
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.1p430 (2010-08-16 revision 28998) [x86_64-linux]

Hi,

The stable version of Ruby 1.9.1 that I have downloaded from http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/ does not have the latest openssl 1.0 patch applied and so will not compile with openssl 1.0.

The latest stable snapshot on the same page also won't compile with openssl 1.0.

openssl 1.0 is becoming a standard part of distributions (e.g. openSUSE 11.3) and so these two will start failing for more and more people.

Could the patch be applied to these two releases? I distribute a program which requires Ruby 1.9, and I would prefer it if my users didn't have to download the development version (or start applying patches themselves :-o )!

Also, I have tried applying the patch in Bug #3093  (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3093) to the stable version, and it failed to fix the problem.

Thanks in advance,

Edmund


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next