[#31647] [Backport #3666] Backport of r26311 (Bug #2587) — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>

Backport #3666: Backport of r26311 (Bug #2587)

13 messages 2010/08/07

[#31666] [Bug #3677] unable to run certain gem binaries' in windows 7 — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Bug #3677: unable to run certain gem binaries' in windows 7

10 messages 2010/08/10

[#31676] [Backport #3680] Splatting calls to_ary instead of to_a in some cases — Tomas Matousek <redmine@...>

Backport #3680: Splatting calls to_ary instead of to_a in some cases

10 messages 2010/08/11

[#31681] [Bug #3683] getgrnam on computer with NIS group (+)? — Rocky Bernstein <redmine@...>

Bug #3683: getgrnam on computer with NIS group (+)?

13 messages 2010/08/11

[#31843] Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...>

This question is no doubt a function of my own lack of understanding, but I think that asking it will at least help some other folks see what's going on with the internals during garbage collection.

17 messages 2010/08/25
[#31861] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...> 2010/08/26

> The question in short: when an object goes out of scope and has no

[#31862] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...> 2010/08/26

Right - so how does a pointer ever get off the stack?

[#31873] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2010/08/27

On 8/26/10 11:51 AM, Asher wrote:

[#31894] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Asher <asher@...> 2010/08/27

I very much appreciate the response, and this is helpful in describing the narrative, but it's still a few steps behind my question - but it may very well have clarified some points that help us get there.

[#31896] Re: Garbage Collection Question — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2010/08/27

You have introduced something called a "root node" without defining it. What do you mean by this?

[#31885] Avoiding $LOAD_PATH pollution — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

Last year Nobu asked me to propose an API for adding an object to

21 messages 2010/08/27

[#31947] not use system for default encoding — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>

It strikes me as a bit "scary" to use system locale settings to

19 messages 2010/08/30

[#31971] Change Ruby's License to BSDL + Ruby's dual license — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>

Ruby's License will change to BSDL + Ruby's dual license

16 messages 2010/08/31

[ruby-core:31619] [Feature #3653] Diferential behaviour of positives and negatives ranges as subindex of string or arrays.

From: Daniel Silberschmidt <redmine@...>
Date: 2010-08-04 14:06:20 UTC
List: ruby-core #31619
Feature #3653: Diferential behaviour of positives and negatives ranges as subindex of string or arrays.
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3653

Author: Daniel Silberschmidt
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: misc

The expression '[a..b]' when applied to a string or to an array  return the slice from the string/array from a to b.
for example [0..3] returns the first four letters from a string
irb(main):004:0> "carromato"[0..3]
=> "carr"
the slice  [-4..-1] returns the last four letters from a string
irb(main):005:0> "carromato"[-4..-1]
=> "mato"
but if the length of the original string is smaller than the slice the results are conceptually very different depending on positive or negative indexes:
irb(main):006:0> "carromato"[0..24]
=> "carromato"
irb(main):007:0> "carromato"[-25..-1]
=> nil
I would like a simetric behaviour in the last case returning the whole word (and not nil). It would be more natural to have the same behaviour when exeding by left of by right of the string/array.
Does Anbody agree or disagree  whith my position?
Daniel


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next