From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Date: 2010-09-02T07:59:48+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:32004] Re: Change Ruby's License to BSDL + Ruby's dual license

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig7BCD3CAD4B0EA24182D34F7E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

(2010/09/02 4:23), Joshua Ballanco wrote:
> Might I also humbly suggest considering the Apache 2 license. The Apach=
e 2 license is fully compatible with GPLv3, and similar to the BSD Licens=
e, but it contains an extra clause covering patent indemnification (see #=
3 here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).

Do you have any practical list of patents or patent holders that exist to=
day
on our distribution?  I don't.  It seems useless to me.


--------------enig7BCD3CAD4B0EA24182D34F7E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=EdRL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig7BCD3CAD4B0EA24182D34F7E--