From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Date: 2010-08-30T06:52:19+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:31935] Re: Proposal: Autoload with block

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig1FDB0C7E86FFD6C2167F0B40
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

(2010/08/30 5:23), Magnus Holm wrote:
> "the code in the block may not be executed (if the constant is defined
> anywhere else), so it is not stable."
>=20
> The same can be said

Yes, and quite simply we (at least me) now consider autoloading a bad ide=
a.
You need to IMPROVE it, rather than just to EXTEND it, if you want it to
survive longer.


--------------enig1FDB0C7E86FFD6C2167F0B40
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Y/bA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig1FDB0C7E86FFD6C2167F0B40--