[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to
5 messages
2004/05/01
[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>
I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a
5 messages
2004/05/06
[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
# dltest.rb
7 messages
2004/05/12
[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
4 messages
2004/05/16
[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Hi, everyone.
6 messages
2004/05/18
[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
2 messages
2004/05/19
[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
A bit contrived,
8 messages
2004/05/20
[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2004/05/23
[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:
[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
2004/05/23
ts wrote:
[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:
[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>
I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in
6 messages
2004/05/22
[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
6 messages
2004/05/25
Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions
From:
nobu.nokada@...
Date:
2004-05-25 09:16:35 UTC
List:
ruby-core #2947
Hi, At Tue, 25 May 2004 12:40:58 +0900, Jeff Mitchell wrote in [ruby-core:02944]: > If f() is defined after main(), it compiles with a warning, > and "a" has a junk value. That case is not problematic, since > you know to move the function as you did. However if f() is > defined in a different file, without -Wstrict-prototypes it > compiles with NO warning, and "a" gets a junk value. Thank you, point taken. But I don't feel it so cool, isn't there any other work around? -- Nobu Nakada