[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to
5 messages
2004/05/01
[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>
I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a
5 messages
2004/05/06
[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
# dltest.rb
7 messages
2004/05/12
[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
4 messages
2004/05/16
[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Hi, everyone.
6 messages
2004/05/18
[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
2 messages
2004/05/19
[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
A bit contrived,
8 messages
2004/05/20
[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2004/05/23
[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:
[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
2004/05/23
ts wrote:
[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:
[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>
I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in
6 messages
2004/05/22
[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
6 messages
2004/05/25
minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc
From:
Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date:
2004-05-14 21:08:10 UTC
List:
ruby-core #2874
I have a lot of code that opens itself up if it is being unit tested at
the time. It usually looks like:
protected unless $TESTING
rdoc -D was showing that it was only expecting a symbol or string after
a visibility specifier via parse_symbol_in_arg. The following patch
allows statements like the above to ignore any conditional modifiers
and still understand the intended visibility as long as it is written
in the default case:
diff -d -u -r1.6.2.17 parse_rb.rb
--- parsers/parse_rb.rb 7 May 2004 13:14:58 -0000 1.6.2.17
+++ parsers/parse_rb.rb 14 May 2004 20:33:28 -0000
@@ -2453,6 +2453,8 @@
if peek_tk.kind_of? TkNL
# error("Missing argument") if singleton
container.ongoing_visibility = vis
+ elsif peek_tk.kind_of? TkUNLESS_MOD or peek_tk.kind_of? TkIF_MOD
+ container.ongoing_visibility = vis
else
args = parse_symbol_arg
container.set_visibility_for(args, vis, singleton)
I would also like to find some way to make %params% extend w/ a space
in front of parenthesis are not used for the method definition.
Otherwise the html renderered looks like "methodargs" with "method"
being bold. But I can't figure this one out in my current exhausted
mental state.