From: Jeff Mitchell Date: 2004-05-23T05:34:40+09:00 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl --- Takaaki Tateishi wrote: > nobu.nokada@softhome.net said: > > st_table would be better rather than Hash. > > Thank you, your patch is fine for me. > I'd like to know whether Jeff successfully run his program. Yes Nobu's patch is good. Ruby now passes all my tests, including some obscure ones which failed from memory corruption after 10 min of loop{}ing. As is clear now, I incorrectly assumed VALUE pointers inside the interpreter have the same alignment as dl pointers (in fact, I produced an odd-numbered pointer in the first post of this thread). __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains � Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer