Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl

From: Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
Date: 2004-05-22 20:34:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #2924
--- Takaaki Tateishi <ttate@ttsky.net> wrote:
> nobu.nokada@softhome.net said:
> > st_table would be better rather than Hash.
> 
> Thank you, your patch is fine for me.
> I'd like to know whether Jeff successfully run his program.

Yes Nobu's patch is good.  Ruby now passes all my tests, including some
obscure ones which failed from memory corruption after 10 min of loop{}ing.

As is clear now, I incorrectly assumed VALUE pointers inside the interpreter
have the same alignment as dl pointers (in fact, I produced an odd-numbered
pointer in the first post of this thread).



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Domains Claim yours for only $14.70/year
http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer 

In This Thread

Prev Next