ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to

5 messages 2004/05/01

[#2842] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/05/04

In article <200405011554.53670.daniel@nightrunner.com>,

[#2847] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/05/05

I like this. Creates a more unified Resolv class.

[#2884] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/05/16

Any objections to getting this committed to the tree?

[#2885] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/05/16

In article <200405161037.39344.daniel@nightrunner.com>,

[#2843] Another bug in fileutils.rb — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/05/04

[#2858] Re: Another bug in fileutils.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/05/07

[#2844] ruby-mode.el indentation fix (another one) — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

This fixes this scenario:

1 message 2004/05/04

[#2845] RDoc: m(&block) {|x| ... } — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc generates a method headline which has both a block

2 messages 2004/05/05

[#2846] Re: RDoc: m(&block) {|x| ... } — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/05

[#2848] Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2004/05/05

[#2849] Re: Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/05/05

On 2004-05-06 08:45:17 +0900, Florian Frank wrote:

[#2850] Re: Tempfile strangeness — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/06

Hi,

[#2855] Re: Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/05/06

On 2004-05-06 09:28:59 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2851] ruby_connect's error handling — Martin Dorey <mdorey@...>

This site:

2 messages 2004/05/06

[#2854] Re: ruby_connect's error handling — Jamie Herre <jlst@...> 2004/05/06

[#2852] Re: Tempfile strangeness — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

2 messages 2004/05/06

[#2856] Re: Tempfile strangeness — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/07

Hi,

[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a

5 messages 2004/05/06

[#2886] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/05/17

On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 02:27:50AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#2887] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/17

[#2888] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/17

Hi,

[#2890] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/05/17

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:31:50PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2857] RDoc ignores second argument of include. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc ignores second (and maybe subsequent) argument of

2 messages 2004/05/07

[#2859] Re: RDoc ignores second argument of include. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/07

[#2860] RDoc doesn't make a link for inner module inclusion. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc doesn't make a link for inner module inclusion as

1 message 2004/05/09

[#2861] RDoc doesn't make a link for a included module — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found another link problem.

2 messages 2004/05/10

[#2862] Re: RDoc doesn't make a link for a included module — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/10

[#2863] RDoc: parent class link problem. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc doesn't make a link for a parent class in following

1 message 2004/05/11

[#2864] memory leak when using continuations+weakrefs? — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/05/11

[#2865] Need help with NKF and encodings — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Hello, folks.

4 messages 2004/05/12

[#2866] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/12

Hi,

[#2868] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/12

[#2870] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/13

Hi,

[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

# dltest.rb

7 messages 2004/05/12

[#2905] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

[#2908] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

[#2909] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

Sorry I am new here. I didn't realize -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes

[#2916] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/21

Hi,

[#2923] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — "Takaaki Tateishi" <ttate@...> 2004/05/22

nobu.nokada@softhome.net said:

[#2924] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/22

[#2869] YAML::Store: {":..." => true} — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/05/12

[#2871] Re: YAML::Store: {":..." => true} — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/13

Hi,

[#2872] ruby-talk : 98651 — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2004/05/13

[#2873] Re: ruby-talk : 98651 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/14

Hi,

[#2874] minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I have a lot of code that opens itself up if it is being unit tested at

4 messages 2004/05/14

[#2910] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/20

[#2914] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/05/20

[#2915] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/21

[#2875] Tempfile problem — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Tempfile seems to use DelegateClass instead of SimpleDelegator in Ruby

2 messages 2004/05/15

[#2880] Re: Tempfile problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/16

Hi,

[#2876] yaml last update — "Kent S." <ksibilev@...>

It seems that the last yaml update broke ri system:

4 messages 2004/05/15

[#2877] Re: yaml last update — "Kent S." <ksibilev@...> 2004/05/15

Another problem:

[#2882] Re: yaml last update — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/16

Kent S. wrote:

[#2883] Re: yaml last update — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/16

Kent S. wrote:

[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

4 messages 2004/05/16

[#2879] tempfile.rb (was Re: Bug in open-uri under win32 (?)) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/05/16

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 05:00:33PM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#2881] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb (was Re: Bug in open-uri under win32 (?)) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/16

Hi,

[#2892] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2004/05/17

Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> writes:

[#2889] 0.0.to_s — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

> ruby -e 'puts 0.0'

2 messages 2004/05/17

[#2891] Re: 0.0.to_s — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/05/17

Thank you for the report.

[#2893] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

Problem:

2 messages 2004/05/18

[#2900] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/19

Hi,

[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Hi, everyone.

6 messages 2004/05/18

[#2895] Re: RI for distribution — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/18

On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 4:59:58 AM, why wrote:

[#2897] Re: RI for distribution — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/18

[#2898] Re: RI for distribution — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/19

>

[#2896] Re: RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/18

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2899] Re: RI for distribution — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/19

> Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hello.

2 messages 2004/05/19

[#2906] Re: [Error] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/19

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#2902] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

Matz:

2 messages 2004/05/19

[#2903] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/19

>>>>> "B" == BH <- Brad Coish <BCoish@Dymaxion.com>> writes:

[#2904] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

TS:

1 message 2004/05/19

[#2911] mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <boson@...>

- check_sizeof() crashes my extconf.rb script.

2 messages 2004/05/20

[#2912] Re: mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/20

Hi,

[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

A bit contrived,

8 messages 2004/05/20

[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/05/23

[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:

[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/23

ts wrote:

[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:

[#2930] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/23

ts wrote:

[#2931] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:

[#2922] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/22

>>>>> "J" == Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@yahoo.com> writes:

[#2917] proposal: map method for getoptlong — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>

usually, when using getoptlong, one wants to test if an option was set,

1 message 2004/05/21

[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>

I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in

6 messages 2004/05/22

[#2919] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/22

Hi,

[#2920] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/22

OK, here it is (slightly modified, but the Ruby parts

[#2921] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/22

Hi,

[#2937] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/24

OK, here comes the C init and calling code. I end up doing about 23 million

[#2936] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/24

[#2925] rdoc: SYSTEM identifiers — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/05/22

[#2932] Re: rdoc: SYSTEM identifiers — Michael Granger <ged@...> 2004/05/23

On May 22, 2004, at 2:09 PM, Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA wrote:

[#2933] Buggy form generation with cgi.rb — evanm@...

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/24

[#2934] Re: Buggy form generation with cgi.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/24

Hi,

[#2935] Re: [BUG] Latest Ruby Stable Snapshot — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "C" == Charles Comstock <cc1@cec.wustl.edu> writes:

1 message 2004/05/24

[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

6 messages 2004/05/25

[#2941] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2942] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/25

[#2943] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2944] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/25

[#2947] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2939] Re: mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

On May 20, 2004, at 12:42 AM, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2940] Re: mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/05/25

Disregard the last email please.

[#2945] Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2946] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2948] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2951] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2949] open3 and timeout - warning: fork terminates thread — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2950] Re: open3 and timeout - warning: fork terminates thread — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2952] File.basename() and mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

When create_makefile() in mkmf.rb builds an array of targets $objs it

4 messages 2004/05/26

[#2953] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/26

Hi,

[#2954] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/05/27

On May 26, 2004, at 4:43 PM, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#2955] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/27

Hi,

[#2956] dbm/gdbm/sdbm etc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Does ext/dbm supersede gdbm and sdbm?

1 message 2004/05/28

[#2957] helium.ruby-lang.org was cracked — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2004/05/29

[#2958] Ruby continuations + GC bug — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/05/31

[#2959] Ruby continuations+GC - less is more — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

My previous example of memory-hogging was too complex, as it turns

2 messages 2004/05/31

[#2960] Re: Ruby continuations+GC - less is more — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...> 2004/05/31

What's even more freaky is that my second example can be "fixed" by

Re: RI for distribution

From: "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...>

Date: 2004-05-19 02:17:58 UTC

List: ruby-core #2899

> Gavin Sinclair wrote:
>
>>So, even if you document every class, perhaps you should only put a few
>> filenames in .document.
>>
> Yeah, that's the answer I was looking for.

Good.  Thanks for documenting YAML in this way.  I'm looking forward to
reading it.

>>RubyGems currently creates RDoc HTML output (when asked) but not ri
>> data.  Your wish is noted, and will speed the process of getting it
>> done.
>>
>>
> Great.  You're doing great work on RubyGems, Gavin.  Yeah, I'd think ri
> output would generally be more useful to people than the HTML
> documentation.

I'd say it's about even.  ri is great when you want a quick reminder of
something, or for some very simple exploring.  But HTML is much much
better for browsing.  And it's browsable online, so it's available
wherever you have Internet access, not just where you have a decent Ruby
installation.

We should always keep both in mind when creating the documentation.  I'm
guilty of HTML bias.

Cheers,
Gavin

Thread

In This Thread

Prev Next