ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>

I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to

5 messages 2004/05/01

[#2842] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/05/04

In article <200405011554.53670.daniel@nightrunner.com>,

[#2847] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — "Daniel Hobe" <daniel@...> 2004/05/05

I like this. Creates a more unified Resolv class.

[#2884] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...> 2004/05/16

Any objections to getting this committed to the tree?

[#2885] Re: Changing Resolv::DNS — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2004/05/16

In article <200405161037.39344.daniel@nightrunner.com>,

[#2843] Another bug in fileutils.rb — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>

2 messages 2004/05/04

[#2858] Re: Another bug in fileutils.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2004/05/07

[#2844] ruby-mode.el indentation fix (another one) — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

This fixes this scenario:

1 message 2004/05/04

[#2845] RDoc: m(&block) {|x| ... } — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc generates a method headline which has both a block

2 messages 2004/05/05

[#2846] Re: RDoc: m(&block) {|x| ... } — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/05

[#2848] Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2004/05/05

[#2849] Re: Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/05/05

On 2004-05-06 08:45:17 +0900, Florian Frank wrote:

[#2850] Re: Tempfile strangeness — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/06

Hi,

[#2855] Re: Tempfile strangeness — Florian Frank <flori@...> 2004/05/06

On 2004-05-06 09:28:59 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2851] ruby_connect's error handling — Martin Dorey <mdorey@...>

This site:

2 messages 2004/05/06

[#2854] Re: ruby_connect's error handling — Jamie Herre <jlst@...> 2004/05/06

[#2852] Re: Tempfile strangeness — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

2 messages 2004/05/06

[#2856] Re: Tempfile strangeness — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/07

Hi,

[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>

I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a

5 messages 2004/05/06

[#2886] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/05/17

On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 02:27:50AM +0900, Jos Backus wrote:

[#2887] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/17

[#2888] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/17

Hi,

[#2890] Re: cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...> 2004/05/17

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:31:50PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#2857] RDoc ignores second argument of include. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc ignores second (and maybe subsequent) argument of

2 messages 2004/05/07

[#2859] Re: RDoc ignores second argument of include. — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/07

[#2860] RDoc doesn't make a link for inner module inclusion. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc doesn't make a link for inner module inclusion as

1 message 2004/05/09

[#2861] RDoc doesn't make a link for a included module — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found another link problem.

2 messages 2004/05/10

[#2862] Re: RDoc doesn't make a link for a included module — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/10

[#2863] RDoc: parent class link problem. — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>

I found that RDoc doesn't make a link for a parent class in following

1 message 2004/05/11

[#2864] memory leak when using continuations+weakrefs? — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/05/11

[#2865] Need help with NKF and encodings — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Hello, folks.

4 messages 2004/05/12

[#2866] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/12

Hi,

[#2868] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/12

[#2870] Re: Need help with NKF and encodings — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/13

Hi,

[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

# dltest.rb

7 messages 2004/05/12

[#2905] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

[#2908] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

[#2909] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/19

Sorry I am new here. I didn't realize -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes

[#2916] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/21

Hi,

[#2923] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — "Takaaki Tateishi" <ttate@...> 2004/05/22

nobu.nokada@softhome.net said:

[#2924] Re: [PATCH] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/22

[#2869] YAML::Store: {":..." => true} — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/05/12

[#2871] Re: YAML::Store: {":..." => true} — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/13

Hi,

[#2872] ruby-talk : 98651 — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2004/05/13

[#2873] Re: ruby-talk : 98651 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/14

Hi,

[#2874] minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I have a lot of code that opens itself up if it is being unit tested at

4 messages 2004/05/14

[#2910] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/20

[#2914] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Ryan Davis <ryand@...> 2004/05/20

[#2915] Re: minor tweak to visibility parser in rdoc — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/21

[#2875] Tempfile problem — Florian Frank <flori@...>

Tempfile seems to use DelegateClass instead of SimpleDelegator in Ruby

2 messages 2004/05/15

[#2880] Re: Tempfile problem — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/16

Hi,

[#2876] yaml last update — "Kent S." <ksibilev@...>

It seems that the last yaml update broke ri system:

4 messages 2004/05/15

[#2877] Re: yaml last update — "Kent S." <ksibilev@...> 2004/05/15

Another problem:

[#2882] Re: yaml last update — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/16

Kent S. wrote:

[#2883] Re: yaml last update — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/16

Kent S. wrote:

[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>

4 messages 2004/05/16

[#2879] tempfile.rb (was Re: Bug in open-uri under win32 (?)) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...> 2004/05/16

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 05:00:33PM +0900, Mauricio Fern疣dez wrote:

[#2881] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb (was Re: Bug in open-uri under win32 (?)) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/16

Hi,

[#2892] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb — Matt Armstrong <matt@...> 2004/05/17

Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@yahoo.com> writes:

[#2889] 0.0.to_s — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

> ruby -e 'puts 0.0'

2 messages 2004/05/17

[#2891] Re: 0.0.to_s — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2004/05/17

Thank you for the report.

[#2893] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

Problem:

2 messages 2004/05/18

[#2900] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/19

Hi,

[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Hi, everyone.

6 messages 2004/05/18

[#2895] Re: RI for distribution — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/18

On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 4:59:58 AM, why wrote:

[#2897] Re: RI for distribution — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2004/05/18

[#2898] Re: RI for distribution — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/19

>

[#2896] Re: RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/18

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2899] Re: RI for distribution — "Gavin Sinclair" <gsinclair@...> 2004/05/19

> Gavin Sinclair wrote:

[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>

Hello.

2 messages 2004/05/19

[#2906] Re: [Error] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/19

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#2902] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

Matz:

2 messages 2004/05/19

[#2903] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/19

>>>>> "B" == BH <- Brad Coish <BCoish@Dymaxion.com>> writes:

[#2904] Re: [Help] Problem with SOCKET API on OpenVMS — BH - Brad Coish <BCoish@...>

TS:

1 message 2004/05/19

[#2911] mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <boson@...>

- check_sizeof() crashes my extconf.rb script.

2 messages 2004/05/20

[#2912] Re: mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/20

Hi,

[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

A bit contrived,

8 messages 2004/05/20

[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2004/05/23

[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:

[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/23

ts wrote:

[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:

[#2930] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2004/05/23

ts wrote:

[#2931] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/23

>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:

[#2922] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — ts <decoux@...> 2004/05/22

>>>>> "J" == Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@yahoo.com> writes:

[#2917] proposal: map method for getoptlong — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>

usually, when using getoptlong, one wants to test if an option was set,

1 message 2004/05/21

[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>

I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in

6 messages 2004/05/22

[#2919] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/22

Hi,

[#2920] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/22

OK, here it is (slightly modified, but the Ruby parts

[#2921] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/22

Hi,

[#2937] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/24

OK, here comes the C init and calling code. I end up doing about 23 million

[#2936] Re: [PATCH] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...> 2004/05/24

[#2925] rdoc: SYSTEM identifiers — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2004/05/22

[#2932] Re: rdoc: SYSTEM identifiers — Michael Granger <ged@...> 2004/05/23

On May 22, 2004, at 2:09 PM, Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA wrote:

[#2933] Buggy form generation with cgi.rb — evanm@...

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/24

[#2934] Re: Buggy form generation with cgi.rb — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/24

Hi,

[#2935] Re: [BUG] Latest Ruby Stable Snapshot — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "C" == Charles Comstock <cc1@cec.wustl.edu> writes:

1 message 2004/05/24

[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>

6 messages 2004/05/25

[#2941] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2942] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/25

[#2943] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2944] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...> 2004/05/25

[#2947] Re: -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2939] Re: mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

On May 20, 2004, at 12:42 AM, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2940] Re: mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/05/25

Disregard the last email please.

[#2945] Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2946] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2948] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — "Berger, Daniel" <djberge@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2951] Re: Autogenerating test targets with mkmf — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2949] open3 and timeout - warning: fork terminates thread — Daniel Berger <djberge@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2004/05/25

[#2950] Re: open3 and timeout - warning: fork terminates thread — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2004/05/25

Hi,

[#2952] File.basename() and mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...>

When create_makefile() in mkmf.rb builds an array of targets $objs it

4 messages 2004/05/26

[#2953] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/26

Hi,

[#2954] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2004/05/27

On May 26, 2004, at 4:43 PM, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#2955] Re: File.basename() and mkmf.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2004/05/27

Hi,

[#2956] dbm/gdbm/sdbm etc — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Does ext/dbm supersede gdbm and sdbm?

1 message 2004/05/28

[#2957] helium.ruby-lang.org was cracked — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

1 message 2004/05/29

[#2958] Ruby continuations + GC bug — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

Hello,

1 message 2004/05/31

[#2959] Ruby continuations+GC - less is more — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...>

My previous example of memory-hogging was too complex, as it turns

2 messages 2004/05/31

[#2960] Re: Ruby continuations+GC - less is more — "=?windows-1251?Q?=D1=EB=E5=EF=ED=E5=E2_=C2=EB=E0=E4=E8=EC=E8=F0?=" <slepnev_v@...> 2004/05/31

What's even more freaky is that my second example can be "fixed" by

Re: RI for distribution

From: why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>

Date: 2004-05-18 23:21:05 UTC

List: ruby-core #2896

Gavin Sinclair wrote:

>So, even if you document every class, perhaps you should only put a
>few filenames in .document.
>  
>
Yeah, that's the answer I was looking for.

>I'm sure Dave will have a suggestion.
>  
>
>RubyGems currently creates RDoc HTML output (when asked) but not ri
>data.  Your wish is noted, and will speed the process of getting it
>done.
>  
>
Great.  You're doing great work on RubyGems, Gavin.  Yeah, I'd think ri 
output would generally be more useful to people than the HTML documentation.

>Now why would you want to include protected and private methods in an
>ri dump?  And what's in the doc/ directory?
>  
>
Umph.  Sorry.  lib/.

_why

Thread

In This Thread