[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to
5 messages
2004/05/01
[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>
I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a
5 messages
2004/05/06
[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
# dltest.rb
7 messages
2004/05/12
[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
4 messages
2004/05/16
[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Hi, everyone.
6 messages
2004/05/18
[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
2 messages
2004/05/19
[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
A bit contrived,
8 messages
2004/05/20
[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2004/05/23
[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:
[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
2004/05/23
ts wrote:
[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:
[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>
I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in
6 messages
2004/05/22
[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
6 messages
2004/05/25
Re: RI for distribution
From:
Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>
Date:
2004-05-18 22:20:33 UTC
List:
ruby-core #2895
On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 4:59:58 AM, why wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
> I'd like to start checking in some RDoc for a bunch of YAML modules. Am
> I okay to add these files into the lib/.document file listing? I'd like
> to document every class in my set. Is that overkill?
In a sense it's overkill, but it doesn't matter; the more the merrier.
Just make sure you provide a good introduction in the obvious place
(or introduce a README file) so casual users can get the information
they need quickly.
Problems with the above:
* there's no way to stop ri from gathering all the available
documentation, even though you might want different results
in HTML and in ri
* ri will ignore a README file
So, even if you document every class, perhaps you should only put a
few filenames in .document.
I'm sure Dave will have a suggestion.
> Also, I'd like my other projects (RedCloth, Hobix, Okay) to install ri
> docs when they are installed (or updated) from either RubyGems or
> install.rb. Is there a suggested means for doing so? Do I use:
> rdoc --all --ri --op "#{ RI_DATA_DIR }" doc/
RubyGems currently creates RDoc HTML output (when asked) but not ri
data. Your wish is noted, and will speed the process of getting it
done.
Generating ri data on an old-fashioned install is no problem. You can
run
rdoc --ri-site --all doc/
Check 'rdoc --help' for details.
Now why would you want to include protected and private methods in an
ri dump? And what's in the doc/ directory?
Cheers,
Gavin