[#2840] Changing Resolv::DNS — Daniel Hobe <daniel@...>
I put out a RCR a while ago (176) that subclassed the Resolv::DNS class to
5 messages
2004/05/01
[#2853] cgi.rb: option to omit HTTP header emission — Jos Backus <jos@...>
I'm trying to use cgi.rb to write HTML-only output. This patch adds a
5 messages
2004/05/06
[#2867] ruby/dl — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
# dltest.rb
7 messages
2004/05/12
[#2878] Bug in open-uri under win32 (?) — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
4 messages
2004/05/16
[#2894] RI for distribution — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
Hi, everyone.
6 messages
2004/05/18
[#2901] test/yaml/test_yaml.rb — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Hello.
2 messages
2004/05/19
[#2913] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml) — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
A bit contrived,
8 messages
2004/05/20
[#2926] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— "daz" <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk>
2004/05/23
[#2927] Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml)
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "d" == daz <dooby@d10.karoo.co.uk> writes:
[#2928] Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...>
2004/05/23
ts wrote:
[#2929] Re: Syck CVS (was Re: [bug] [yaml] YAML.load([1,2,3].to_yaml.to_yaml))
— ts <decoux@...>
2004/05/23
>>>>> "w" == why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@whytheluckystiff.net> writes:
[#2918] fixed SIG_SEGV in check_stack() in eval.c — b g <bg_rubyposter_123456@...>
I was getting a crash at 'JUMP_TAG(state);' in
6 messages
2004/05/22
[#2938] -Wstrict-prototypes for extensions — Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
6 messages
2004/05/25
-Wstrict-prototypes for extensions
From:
Jeff Mitchell <quixoticsycophant@...>
Date:
2004-05-25 00:10:06 UTC
List:
ruby-core #2938
It is inconvenient compiling extensions with -Wstrict-prototypes
because ruby.h and intern.h emit a slew of warnings. This is
important because
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int a = f() ;
/* ------> a contains junk <------ */
printf("%d\n", a) ;
}
double f() {
return 99.0 ;
}
You will not obtain a warning if f() is defined in a different file.
I propose
#define RUBY_STRICT_PROTOTYPES
#include "ruby.h"
for extension writers wishing strict prototypes.
--- defines.h 14 Apr 2004 02:03:15 -0000 1.41
+++ defines.h 24 May 2004 23:34:49 -0000
@@ -38,7 +38,11 @@
#ifdef __cplusplus
#define ANYARGS ...
#else
-#define ANYARGS
+# ifdef RUBY_STRICT_PROTOTYPES
+# define ANYARGS void
+# else
+# define ANYARGS
+# endif
#endif
#define xmalloc ruby_xmalloc
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/