[#205] openbsd system call changes — Jamie Herre <jfh@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2002/07/05
[#216] lib/mkfm.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>
This could be me over looking something, but in mkmf.rb, there is no
7 messages
2002/07/07
[#221] Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — Matthew Bloch <matthew@...>(by way of Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>)
Hi there;
4 messages
2002/07/12
[#228] Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>
Hello;
6 messages
2002/07/17
[#237] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Robert Skarwecki <skaav@...>
Hello everybody,
42 messages
2002/07/24
[#239] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...>
2002/07/24
At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:02:28 +0900,
[#240] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2002/07/24
GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:
[#246] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...>
2002/07/25
At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:05:46 +0900,
[#247] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2002/07/25
GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:
[#248] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— nobu.nokada@...
2002/07/25
Hi,
[#249] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2002/07/25
nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:
[#250] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— nobu.nokada@...
2002/07/25
Hi,
[#252] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...>
2002/07/25
At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:11:02 +0900,
[#253] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2002/07/25
GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:
[#255] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...>
2002/07/25
At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:34:10 +0900,
[#268] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...>
2002/07/27
In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"
[#269] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2002/07/27
Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@nifty.ne.jp> writes:
[#288] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...>
2002/08/03
In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"
[#295] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...>
2002/08/05
Hi,
[#260] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
— kjana@...4lab.to (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa)
2002/07/26
In message <m2bs8vr1h7.fsf@zip.local.thomases.com>
[#279] A truth? patch + benchmarks
— "Christoph" <chr_news@...>
2002/07/31
[#280] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks
— ts <decoux@...>
2002/07/31
>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:
[#283] RE: A truth? patch + benchmarks
— "Christoph" <chr_news@...>
2002/08/01
[#241] Compiling ruby on SGI origins — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>
I just tried compiling ruby-1.6.7 on a couple SGI origins (mips-sgi-irix6.5),
6 messages
2002/07/25
Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)
From:
Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date:
2002-07-26 15:31:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #263
Michal Rokos <m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz> writes:
> To get the same level of real-word-perception as SmallTalk has,
> it is needed to:
> (1) * raise error if argument to RTEST isn't kind of Boolean
> (2) * remove all #to_* and boolean (#&, #|) methods for nil.
Although this is a pure approach, I think it would make programming in
Ruby harder. Being able to say things like
while line = gets
...
end
is just too useful for the small tasks folks often use Ruby
for. Wrapping that up in a more theoretically sound
while !(line = gets).nil?
loses a lot.
Now I know that folks would then say: but you shouldn't do
this. ARGF.each or whatever is more expressive and avoids the
problem. And I agree. But the reality is that the user community
appreciates the variety of styles supported by Ruby, and one of the
reasons people take to Ruby in the first place is the ability to write
familiar looking code.
Cheers
Dave