[#237] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Robert Skarwecki <skaav@...>

Hello everybody,

42 messages 2002/07/24
[#239] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/24

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:02:28 +0900,

[#240] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/24

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#246] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:05:46 +0900,

[#247] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#248] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#249] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#250] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#252] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:11:02 +0900,

[#253] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

Re: [PATCH] lib/mkmf.rb: have_bin()/find_bin()

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2002-07-20 15:50:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #235
Hi,

In message "Re: [PATCH]  lib/mkmf.rb:  have_bin()/find_bin()"
    on 02/07/20, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> writes:

|Looks fine to me, but I wonder if both are necessary, have_bin
|seems to work good enough even if it were an alias of find_bin.

I feel like "bin" in have_bin and find_bin (BTW, why both?) is better
to be replaced by "executable".

							matz.

In This Thread