ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#196] nil#to_f missing — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/07/02

[#197] Re: [Fix] nil#to_f missing — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/02

Hi,

[#198] Re: [Fix] nil#to_f missing — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/02

Hi,

[#199] Mem leaks in rb_str_become? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/07/04

[#200] Re: Mem leaks in rb_str_become? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/04

Hi,

[#201] Bug in enum.c? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2002/07/04

[#202] Re: Bug in enum.c? — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/04

Hi,

[#203] Re: Bug in enum.c? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/04

Hi,

[#204] Re: Bug in enum.c? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/07/05

Hello,

[#205] openbsd system call changes — Jamie Herre <jfh@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2002/07/05

[#210] Re: openbsd system call changes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/06

Hi,

[#211] Re: openbsd system call changes — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/07/06

> |I made the following changes in order to get the current ruby to compile

[#206] Re: openbsd system call changes — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/05

Hi,

[#207] Re: openbsd system call changes — Jamie Herre <jfh@...> 2002/07/05

[#214] Re: openbsd system call changes — kjana@...4lab.to (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 2002/07/06

The patch around setpgrp() let me recall the bug of autoconf-2.52

[#215] Re: openbsd system call changes — Jamie Herre <jfh@...> 2002/07/06

Aha. I'm using 2.52. I will upgrade.

[#208] RSTRING macro in array context — Jamie Herre <jfh@...>

Is this a typo?

2 messages 2002/07/05

[#212] Re: RSTRING macro in array context — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/06

Hi,

[#209] OpenSSL in the base system? — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

What are the odds of having Michal Rokos's OpenSSL included in the

2 messages 2002/07/05

[#220] Re: OpenSSL in the base system? — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/07/08

Hi,

[#213] Consistent class naming for TCPSocket... — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

Attached is a patch to fix consistency issues with TCPSocket and

1 message 2002/07/06

[#216] lib/mkfm.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — Sean Chittenden <sean@...>

This could be me over looking something, but in mkmf.rb, there is no

7 messages 2002/07/07

[#217] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkfm.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/07/07

> This could be me over looking something, but in mkmf.rb, there is no

[#218] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkfm.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/07

Hi,

[#219] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkfm.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/07/08

[resent]

[#234] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkmf.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/20

Hi,

[#235] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkmf.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/20

Hi,

[#323] Re: [PATCH] lib/mkmf.rb: have_bin()/find_bin() — Sean Chittenden <sean@...> 2002/08/14

> |Looks fine to me, but I wonder if both are necessary, have_bin

[#221] Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — Matthew Bloch <matthew@...>(by way of Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>)

Hi there;

4 messages 2002/07/12

[#222] Re: Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — Jamie Herre <jfh@...> 2002/07/12

Looks like what you've done is to replace ruby's calls to malloc with a

[#223] Re: Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...> 2002/07/12

On Friday 12 July 2002 17:05, you wrote:

[#224] Re: Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/12

Hi,

[#225] Re: [gclist] Wiring up the Boehm GC to the Ruby interpreter — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

1 message 2002/07/12

[#227] speed improvements during ruby_init — Jamie Herre <jfh@...>

Hi,

1 message 2002/07/14

[#228] Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>

Hello;

6 messages 2002/07/17

[#229] Re: Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/17

Hi,

[#230] Re: Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...> 2002/07/17

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 14:12, you wrote:

[#231] Re: Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/17

>>>>> "M" == Matthew Bloch <mattbee@soup-kitchen.net> writes:

[#232] Re: Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...> 2002/07/17

On Wednesday 17 July 2002 15:34, you wrote:

[#233] Re: Patch to stop TCPSocket.new blocking on DNS lookups — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/17

Hi,

[#236] resolv.rb — "Stephane D'Alu" <sdalu@...>

The patch is for ruby-1.7.2.2002.07.15:

1 message 2002/07/22

[#237] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Robert Skarwecki <skaav@...>

Hello everybody,

42 messages 2002/07/24

[#239] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/24

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:02:28 +0900,

[#240] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/24

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#246] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:05:46 +0900,

[#262] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/07/26

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 08:06:17PM +0900, GOTO Kentaro wrote:

[#266] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/26

Hi,

[#263] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/26

Michal Rokos <m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz> writes:

[#247] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#258] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2002/07/26

Hi,

[#248] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#249] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#250] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#252] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:11:02 +0900,

[#253] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#255] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:34:10 +0900,

[#268] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2002/07/27

In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"

[#269] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/27

Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@nifty.ne.jp> writes:

[#288] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2002/08/03

In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"

[#295] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2002/08/05

Hi,

[#304] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2002/08/06

In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"

[#313] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2002/08/09

Hi Suketa-san,

[#315] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2002/08/10

In message "Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"

[#320] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2002/08/12

Hi, Suketa-san,

[#260] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — kjana@...4lab.to (YANAGAWA Kazuhisa) 2002/07/26

In message <m2bs8vr1h7.fsf@zip.local.thomases.com>

[#279] A truth? patch + benchmarks — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/07/31

[#280] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/31

>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:

[#283] RE: A truth? patch + benchmarks — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/08/01

[#284] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/01

Hi,

[#285] RE: A truth? patch + benchmarks — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/08/02

[#286] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks — ts <decoux@...> 2002/08/02

>>>>> "C" == Christoph <chr_news@gmx.net> writes:

[#287] RE: A truth? patch + benchmarks — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/08/02

[#289] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/08/03

Hi,

[#294] RE: A truth? patch + benchmarks — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/08/05

[#296] Re: A truth? patch + benchmarks — nobu.nokada@... 2002/08/05

Hi,

[#251] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#324] Mswin32 build flags — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/08/16

Hi,

[#325] Re: Mswin32 build flags — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2002/08/16

Hello,

[#422] RE: Mswin32 build flags — "Christoph" <chr_news@...> 2002/09/03

[#242] unifying nil and false (Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#243] Re: unifying nil and false (Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

matz@ruby-lang.org (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#244] Re: unifying nil and false (Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#238] Boolean class (Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/24

Hi,

[#241] Compiling ruby on SGI origins — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

I just tried compiling ruby-1.6.7 on a couple SGI origins (mips-sgi-irix6.5),

6 messages 2002/07/25

[#245] Re: Compiling ruby on SGI origins — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#265] Re: Compiling ruby on SGI origins — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2002/07/26

Bil Kleb wrote:

[#264] Re: Compiling ruby on SGI origins — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2002/07/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#267] Re: Compiling ruby on SGI origins — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/26

Hi,

[#274] Re: Compiling ruby on SGI origins — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...> 2002/07/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#254] A couple of questions on writing extensions — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...>

*) what does 'Died with exception wrong argument type Object (expected Data)'

4 messages 2002/07/25

[#256] Re: A couple of questions on writing extensions — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...> 2002/07/25

On Thursday 25 July 2002 22:09, Matthew Bloch wrote:

[#257] Re: A couple of questions on writing extensions — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/26

Hi,

[#259] Re: A couple of questions on writing extensions — Matthew Bloch <mattbee@...> 2002/07/26

On Friday 26 July 2002 01:56, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#261] FYI: Updated Boehm GC — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

I know there were some activities a bit back on this...

1 message 2002/07/26

[#270] Who'd be the best person to handle this? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2002/07/27

[#271] Re: Who'd be the best person to handle this? — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/27

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> writes:

[#272] Questions about installing in a corporate WAN — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi All:

3 messages 2002/07/27

[#273] Re: Questions about installing in a corporate WAN — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/28

>>>>> "J" == Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#275] Re: Questions about installing in a corporate WAN — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/29

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#276] Tini mini Range cleanup — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2002/07/30

[#277] Re: [Patch] Tini mini Range cleanup — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/07/30

Hi,

[#278] Re: [Patch] Tini mini Range cleanup — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...> 2002/07/30

Hi,

[#281] ThreadSafeRuby — Michal Rokos <m.rokos@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2002/07/31

[#282] Re: [NothinkToDo] ThreadSafeRuby — ts <decoux@...> 2002/07/31

>>>>> "M" == Michal Rokos <m.rokos@sh.cvut.cz> writes:

Boolean class (Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h)

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Date: 2002-07-24 16:51:24 UTC

List: ruby-core #238

Hi,

In message "[PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)"
    on 02/07/25, Robert Skarwecki <skaav@gmx.net> writes:

|my name is Robert Skarwecki and this is my first contribution to the Ruby
|development.
|
|The patch implements the ToDo task "introduce Boolean class; super of
|TrueClass, FalseClass".

Thank you for the contribution.  Two points:

  * use unified diff (diff -u) instead of plain old diff to create
    patches.  Patches created by old diff are too much context
    sensitive.  Even the smallest change will prevent them to be
    applied.

  * most of the entries in the ToDo file are actually "things need to
    be discussed before implementation". ;-)  This one is typical.
    But your work is not vain.  It should be the driving force for
    discussion about this issue.

So, everyone, feel free to discuss.  Do you think we need Boolean
class?

							matz.

Thread

In This Thread