[#237] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Robert Skarwecki <skaav@...>

Hello everybody,

42 messages 2002/07/24
[#239] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/24

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 00:02:28 +0900,

[#240] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/24

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#246] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Thu, 25 Jul 2002 05:05:46 +0900,

[#247] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

[#248] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#249] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#250] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/07/25

Hi,

[#252] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@...> 2002/07/25

At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:11:02 +0900,

[#253] Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/07/25

GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@notwork.org> writes:

Re: [PATCH] object.c ruby.h (fwd)

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2002-07-25 18:28:49 UTC
List: ruby-core #251
nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

> At Fri, 26 Jul 2002 02:55:28 +0900,
> Dave Thomas wrote:
> > Well, to me, a.true? would imply the same as a == true, which isn't
> > what it does. #to_b, however, implies a conversion to the mythical
> > Boolean type. :)
> 
> Hmmm, then a.t?.  It would be lispy...

Well, I guess the _ideal_ would be to have nothing, and to then have
assert have the same semantics for its parameter as regular
conditional contexts (that is, I _still_ think it is silly for assert
to check that its parameter is 'true' or 'false' when an 'if'
statement doesn't.. :)


Cheers


Dave

In This Thread