[#107008] [Ruby master Bug#18465] Make `IO#write` atomic. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18465 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
16 messages
2022/01/09
[#107150] [Ruby master Feature#18494] [RFC] ENV["RUBY_GC_..."]= changes GC parameters dynamically — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18494 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2022/01/17
[#107170] Re: [Ruby master Feature#18494] [RFC] ENV["RUBY_GC_..."]= changes GC parameters dynamically
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2022/01/17
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18494
[#107302] [Ruby master Bug#18553] Memory leak on compiling method call with kwargs — "ibylich (Ilya Bylich)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18553 has been reported by ibylich (Ilya Bylich).
4 messages
2022/01/27
[#107346] [Ruby master Misc#18557] DevMeeting-2022-02-17 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18557 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
18 messages
2022/01/29
[ruby-core:107174] [Ruby master Bug#18396] An unexpected "hash value omission" syntax error when without parentheses call expr follows
From:
"tycooon (Yuri Smirnov)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-01-18 10:09:59 UTC
List:
ruby-core #107174
Issue #18396 has been updated by tycooon (Yuri Smirnov).
Personally I would suggest only allowing shorthand syntax in case when brackets are present. So that
```ruby
p x: 15 # Syntax error
p(x: 15) # Works
```
OR maybe change current behavior and require trailing backslash in order to make it use the expression on the next line:
```ruby
a = 1, b = 2
p a:, b: # Always works like p(a:, b:)
p a:, b: \
15
# => { a: 1, b: 15 }
----------------------------------------
Bug #18396: An unexpected "hash value omission" syntax error when without parentheses call expr follows
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18396#change-96034
* Author: koic (Koichi ITO)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* ruby -v: ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-12-07T23:18:11Z master 4a3e7984bf) [x86_64-darwin19]
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
## Summary
I encountered an unexpected "hash value omission" syntax error when parentheses call expression follows:
```ruby
% cat example.rb
foo key:
foo arg
```
```console
% ruby -cv /tmp/b.rb
ruby 3.1.0dev (2021-12-07T23:18:11Z master 4a3e7984bf) [x86_64-darwin19]
example.rb:2: syntax error, unexpected local variable or method, expecting `do' or '{' or '('
foo arg
```
## Additional Information
The following is a traditional usage.
```ruby
# No errors.
foo key: key
foo arg
```
A syntax error is unexpectedly raised when hash value omission argument without parentheses is followed by a method call without parentheses.
```ruby
# No errors is expected, but syntax error is raised.
foo key:
foo arg
```
No error occurs if any of the calls have parentheses.
```ruby
# No errors.
foo(key:)
foo arg
```
```ruby
# Also no errors.
foo key:
foo(arg)
```
No error occurs when calling alone.
```ruby
# No errors.
foo key:
```
I encountered this error while trying to apply hash value omission to RSpec code of a real-world application (proprietary) .
But this is a new Ruby 3.1 syntax and may not be supported yet. Thank you.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>