[#108461] [Ruby master Bug#18762] Add an Array#undigits that compliments Integer#digits — "shan (Shannon Skipper)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18762 has been reported by shan (Shannon Skipper).

8 messages 2022/05/02

[#108499] [Ruby master Bug#18767] IO.foreach hangs up when passes limit=0 — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18767 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

9 messages 2022/05/10

[#108500] [Ruby master Bug#18768] Inconsistent behavior of IO, StringIO and String each_line methods when return paragraph and chomp: true passed — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18768 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

7 messages 2022/05/10

[#108511] [Ruby master Feature#18773] deconstruct to receive a range — "kddeisz (Kevin Newton)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18773 has been reported by kddeisz (Kevin Newton).

12 messages 2022/05/11

[#108514] [Ruby master Feature#18774] Add Queue#pop(timeout:) — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18774 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

17 messages 2022/05/11

[#108522] [Ruby master Feature#18776] Object Shapes — "jemmai (Jemma Issroff)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18776 has been reported by jemmai (Jemma Issroff).

25 messages 2022/05/11

[#108543] [Ruby master Bug#18779] `GC.compact` and other compaction related methods should be defined as rb_f_notimplement on non supported platforms. — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18779 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

10 messages 2022/05/13

[#108546] [Ruby master Bug#18780] Incorrect binding receiver for C API rb_eval_string() — "daveola (David Stellar)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18780 has been reported by daveola (David Stellar).

21 messages 2022/05/13

[#108549] [Ruby master Bug#18781] MJIT tests failing with Ubuntu focal with gcc-11 and some flags — "jaruga (Jun Aruga)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18781 has been reported by jaruga (Jun Aruga).

8 messages 2022/05/14

[#108552] [Ruby master Bug#18782] Race conditions in autoload when loading the same feature with multiple threads. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18782 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

11 messages 2022/05/14

[#108565] [Ruby master Bug#18784] `FileUtils.rm_f` and `FileUtils.rm_rf` should not mask exceptions — deivid <noreply@...>

Issue #18784 has been reported by deivid (David Rodr鱈guez).

33 messages 2022/05/16

[#108590] [Ruby master Feature#18788] Support passing Regexp options as String to Regexp.new — janosch-x <noreply@...>

Issue #18788 has been reported by janosch-x (Janosch M端ller).

10 messages 2022/05/17

[#108659] [Ruby master Bug#18798] `UnboundMethod#==` with inherited classes — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18798 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

16 messages 2022/05/24

[#108708] [Ruby master Bug#18808] Cannot compile ruby 3.1.2 on powerpc64le-linux without disabling the jit features — "npn (John Davis)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18808 has been reported by npn (John Davis).

17 messages 2022/05/26

[#108724] [Ruby master Feature#18809] Add Numeric#ceildiv — "kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18809 has been reported by kyanagi (Kouhei Yanagita).

9 messages 2022/05/27

[#108728] [Ruby master Bug#18810] Make `Kernel#p` interruptable. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18810 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

13 messages 2022/05/28

[ruby-core:108736] [Ruby master Bug#18465] Make `IO#write` atomic.

From: "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-05-30 03:19:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #108736
Issue #18465 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).


I cannot understand this change well. Could you show me a code example to demonstrate this change?

I tried the following code in Ruby 3.1, but I couldn't observe the behavior that `A` and `B` are interleaved.

```
a = ["A" * 100_000] * 1000
b = ["B" * 100_000] * 1000

open("output.txt", "w") do |f|
  th = Thread.new { f.write(*a) }
  f.write(*b)
  th.join
end

p File.read("t").gsub(/(.)\1*/) { $1 } #=> "BA" or "AB"
```


----------------------------------------
Bug #18465: Make `IO#write` atomic.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18465#change-97791

* Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams)
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Right now, `IO#write` including everything that calls it including `IO#puts`, has a poorly specified behaviour w.r.t. other fibers/threads that call `IO#write` at the same time.

Internally, we have a write lock, however it's only used to lock against individual writes rather than the whole operation. From a user point of view, there is some kind of atomicity, but it's not clearly defined and depends on many factors, e.g. whether `write` or `writev` is used internally.

We propose to make `IO#write` an atomic operation, that is, `IO#write` on a synchronous/buffered IO will always perform the write operation using a lock around the entire operation.

In theory, this should actually be more efficient than the current approach which may acquire and release the lock several times per operation, however in practice I'm sure it's almost unnoticeable.

Where it does matter, is when interleaved operations invoke the fiber scheduler. By using a single lock around the entire operation, rather than one or more locks around the system calls, the entire operation is more predictable and behaves more robustly.



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next