[#109095] [Ruby master Misc#18888] Migrate ruby-lang.org mail services to Google Domains and Google Workspace — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18888 has been reported by shugo (Shugo Maeda).
16 messages
2022/06/30
[ruby-core:108948] [Ruby master Feature#18788] Support passing Regexp options as String to Regexp.new
From:
"matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-06-16 06:26:25 UTC
List:
ruby-core #108948
Issue #18788 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
Accepted. Unknown flags should raise errors.
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Feature #18788: Support passing Regexp options as String to Regexp.new
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18788#change-98043
* Author: janosch-x (Janosch M端ller)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
## Current situation
`Regexp.new` takes an integer as second argument which needs to be ORed together from multiple constants:
```ruby
Regexp.new('foo', Regexp::IGNORECASE | Regexp::MULTILINE | Regexp::EXTENDED) # => /foo/imx
```
Any other non-nil value is treated as `i` flag:
```ruby
Regexp.new('foo', Object.new) # => /foo/i
```
## Suggestion
`Regexp.new` should support passing the regexp flags not only as an Integer, but also as a String, like so:
```ruby
Regexp.new('foo', 'i') # => /foo/i
Regexp.new('foo', 'imx') # => /foo/imx
# edge cases
Regexp.new('foo', 'iii') # => /foo/i
Regexp.new('foo', '') # => /foo/
# unsupported flags should probably emit a warning
Regexp.new('foo', 'jmq') # => /foo/m
Regexp.new('foo', '-m') # => /foo/m
```
## Reasons
1. The constants are a bit cumbersome to use, particularly when building the regexp from variable data:
```ruby
def make_regexp(regexp_body, opt_string)
opt_int = 0
opt_int |= Regexp::IGNORECASE if opt_string.include?('i')
opt_int |= Regexp::MULTILINE if opt_string.include?('m')
opt_int |= Regexp::EXTENDED if opt_string.include?('x')
Regexp.new(regexp_body, opt_int)
end
```
2. Passing a String is already silently accepted, and people might get the wrong impression that it works:
```ruby
Regexp.new('foo', 'i') # => /foo/i
```
... but it doesn't really work:
```ruby
Regexp.new('foo', 'x') # => /foo/i
```
## Backwards compatibility
This change would not be fully backwards compatible.
Code that relies on the second argument being a String which does not contain "i" in order to make the Regexp case insensitive would break.
*Note: originally I suggested supporting Symbols in the same way as Strings, but removed that in light of the discussion.*
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>