From: "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans)" Date: 2022-07-11T15:34:10+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:109186] [Ruby master Misc#18836] DevMeeting-2022-07-21 Issue #18836 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). * [Bug #18770] Inconsistent behavior of IO/StringIO's each methods when called with nil as a separator, limit and chomp: true (jeremyevans0) * When using `nil` separator and `chomp` keyword, should IO chomp a final line separator? * I don't think it should, as `chomp` should only remove separators, and `nil` separator means no separator. * Assuming we should not chomp in this case, is the pull request acceptable? * [Bug #18768] Inconsistent behavior of IO, StringIO and String each_line methods when return paragraph and chomp: true passed (jeremyevans0) * When using paragraph separator and `chomp`, should String#each_line be changed to chomp paragraphs instead of lines? * Assuming we should chomp paragraphs in this case, is the pull request acceptable? * [Bug #18905] :"@=".inspect is non-evaluatable (jeremyevans0) * I don't think this is a bug, since Ruby does not attempt to ensure inspect returns valid Ruby code (e.g. `Object#inspect`). * Do we want to change it so that `Symbol#inspect` always returns valid ruby code (something you can pass to `eval`)? * [Bug #18837] Not possible to evaluate expression with numbered parameters in it (jeremyevans0) * I agree with the poster that this isn't a bug, the issue should probably be switched to feature. * Do we want to change things so that bindings can deal with numbered parameters? * [Bug #18784] `FileUtils.rm_f` and `FileUtils.rm_rf` should not mask exceptions (jeremyevans0) * Should these methods only swallow exceptions if passed files that don't exist? ---------------------------------------- Misc #18836: DevMeeting-2022-07-21 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18836#change-98327 * Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- # The next dev meeting **Date: 2022/07/21 13:00-17:00** (JST) Log: *TBD* - Dev meeting *IS NOT* a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker. - Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly. - Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue). - We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English. - All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers). - The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time. - *DO NOT* discuss then on this ticket, please. # Call for agenda items If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format: ``` * [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name) * Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.) ``` Example: ``` * [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1) * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature. ``` - It is recommended to add a comment by 2022/07/18. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting. - The format is strict. We'll use [this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda](https://gist.github.com/mame/b0390509ce1491b43610b9ebb665eb86). We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format. - Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: