[#109095] [Ruby master Misc#18888] Migrate ruby-lang.org mail services to Google Domains and Google Workspace — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18888 has been reported by shugo (Shugo Maeda).
16 messages
2022/06/30
[ruby-core:108754] [Ruby master Feature#18814] Ractor: add method to query incoming message queue size
From:
phigrofi <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-06-02 10:57:24 UTC
List:
ruby-core #108754
Issue #18814 has been reported by phigrofi (Philipp Groテ歹lfinger).
----------------------------------------
Feature #18814: Ractor: add method to query incoming message queue size
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18814
* Author: phigrofi (Philipp Groテ歹lfinger)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
## Abstract
A simple method to query the current size of a Ractor's incoming queue from outside. Can be used to decide on the sender's side if a message is sent or postponed.
## Background
Ractors have an infinite incoming message queue. When messages are sent to a Ractor it is not possible to check the current count of elements in the queue. A workaround would be: The receiving Ractor could immediately accept each message and put them into a separate queue and keep track of their count. Then the sending Ractor could query the count from the receiving Ractor as a message.
While this message exchange would be short and simple, it still requires the receiving Ractor to process the "queue-count" message and respond to it.
## Proposal
The Ractor implementation already keeps track of the current incoming message fill level in the field `sync.incoming_queue.cnt`. A simple method in the ruby code of Ractor could expose this number so that it is simple to query the queue size from outside. This works without any interaction of the queried Ractor.
The code would work as follows:
``` ruby
ractor = Ractor.new do
loop { sleep(1) }
end
ractor.queue_size #=> 0
ractor << "message"
ractor.queue_size #=> 1
ractor << "message"
ractor.queue_size #=> 2
```
## Use cases
1. Avoid queue overflow by checking queue size from outside before sending further messages.
2. Incoming queue sizes can be monitored.
## Discussion
The proposal makes it much easier to prevent overflow of a message queue than managing a separate queue inside of a Ractor and keeping track of its element count. I think also having a separate queue where the count needs to communicated, ignores the concept of a Ractor's incoming message queue and makes it quite complicated.
## See also
In this [issue](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17679) a middleman solution was proposed which keeps track of a separate queue count.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>