[#106939] [Ruby master Bug#18455] `IO#close` has poor performance and difficult to understand semantics. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18455 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

10 messages 2022/01/01

[#106977] [Ruby master Feature#18461] closures are capturing unused variables — "bughit (bug hit)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18461 has been reported by bughit (bug hit).

12 messages 2022/01/05

[#106994] [Ruby master Feature#18462] Proposal to merge WASI based WebAssembly support — "katei (Yuta Saito)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18462 has been reported by katei (Yuta Saito).

8 messages 2022/01/07

[#106996] [Ruby master Feature#18463] Random number generation with xoshiro — "bbrklm (Benson Muite)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18463 has been reported by bbrklm (Benson Muite).

8 messages 2022/01/07

[#107005] [Ruby master Bug#18464] RUBY_INTERNAL_EVENT_NEWOBJ tracepoint causes an interpreter crash when combined with Ractors — "kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18464 has been reported by kjtsanaktsidis (KJ Tsanaktsidis).

14 messages 2022/01/08

[#107008] [Ruby master Bug#18465] Make `IO#write` atomic. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18465 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).

16 messages 2022/01/09

[#107073] [Ruby master Feature#18481] Porting YJIT to Rust (request for feedback) — "maximecb (Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18481 has been reported by maximecb (Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert).

26 messages 2022/01/12

[#107106] [Ruby master Bug#18487] Kernel#binding behaves differently depending on implementation language of items on the stack — "alanwu (Alan Wu)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18487 has been reported by alanwu (Alan Wu).

11 messages 2022/01/13

[#107190] [Ruby master Feature#18498] Introduce a public WeakKeysMap that compares by equality — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18498 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

17 messages 2022/01/19

[#107203] [Ruby master Bug#18501] [BUG] try to mark T_NONE object in RubyVM::InstructionSequence. load_from_binary — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18501 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

8 messages 2022/01/20

[#107204] [Ruby master Bug#18502] Make ruby-2.7.5 on Solaris 10 ld.so.1: gcc: fatal: libintl.so.8: open failed: No such file or directory — "dklein (Dmitri Klein)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18502 has been reported by dklein (Dmitri Klein).

8 messages 2022/01/20

[#107275] [Ruby master Bug#18512] MacOS 12.1 Monterey Bug — "oucl5976@... (Paul Liu)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18512 has been reported by oucl5976@gmail.com (Paul Liu).

9 messages 2022/01/25

[#107291] [Ruby master Bug#18518] NoMemoryError + [FATAL] failed to allocate memory for twice 1 << large — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18518 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

12 messages 2022/01/26

[#107310] [Ruby master Bug#18555] Running "bundle exec middleman server" on M1 Mac gives [BUG] Bus Error at 0x0000000104b04000 — "anthonyaykut (Anthony Aykut)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18555 has been reported by anthonyaykut (Anthony Aykut).

13 messages 2022/01/28

[#107346] [Ruby master Misc#18557] DevMeeting-2022-02-17 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18557 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

18 messages 2022/01/29

[#107392] [Ruby master Bug#18560] "Compaction isn't available on this platform" error running PG test suite on ppc64le — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18560 has been reported by vo.x (Vit Ondruch).

7 messages 2022/01/31

[ruby-core:107400] [Ruby master Bug#18561] Make singleton def operation and define_singleton_method explicitly use public visibility

From: "headius (Charles Nutter)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-01-31 19:09:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #107400
Issue #18561 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

----------------------------------------
Bug #18561: Make singleton def operation and define_singleton_method explicitly use public visibility
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18561

* Author: headius (Charles Nutter)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Backport: 2.6: UNKNOWN, 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Currently nearly all uses of `define_singleton_method` or `def obj.foo` will ignore the caller's frame/cref visibility and use the default visibility of public. I propose this be made explicit in the code, documentation, and ruby specs.

```
$ ruby -e 'class Foo; private; define_singleton_method(:foo) {p :ok}; end; Foo.foo'
:ok
$ ruby -e 'class Foo; private; def self.foo; p :ok; end; end; Foo.foo'
:ok
```

This works because the class in which the method is defined is nearly always different from the calling scope, since we are usually calling `define_singleton_method` against some other object. It "accidentally" ends up being public all the time, like `def self.foo`.

However, there is at least one (weird) edge case where the frame/cref visibility is honored:

```
$ ruby -e '$o = Object.new; class << $o; private; $o.define_singleton_method(:foo){}; end; $o.foo'
-e:1:in `<main>': private method `foo' called for #<Object:0x00007fcf0e00dc98> (NoMethodError)
```

This also works for `def $o.foo` but I would argue this is unexpected behavior in both cases. It is difficult to trigger, since you have to already be within the target singleton class body, and the "normal" behavior everywhere else is to ignore the frame/cref visibility.

It would not be difficult to make both forms always use public visibility:

* Split off the actual method-binding logic from `rb_mod_define_method` into a separate function `mod_define_method_internal` that takes a visibility parameter.
* Call that new method from `rb_mod_define_method` (with cref-based visibility calculation) and `rb_obj_define_method` (with explicit public visibility).



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread

Prev Next