[#107008] [Ruby master Bug#18465] Make `IO#write` atomic. — "ioquatix (Samuel Williams)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18465 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
16 messages
2022/01/09
[#107150] [Ruby master Feature#18494] [RFC] ENV["RUBY_GC_..."]= changes GC parameters dynamically — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18494 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
4 messages
2022/01/17
[#107170] Re: [Ruby master Feature#18494] [RFC] ENV["RUBY_GC_..."]= changes GC parameters dynamically
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2022/01/17
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18494
[#107302] [Ruby master Bug#18553] Memory leak on compiling method call with kwargs — "ibylich (Ilya Bylich)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18553 has been reported by ibylich (Ilya Bylich).
4 messages
2022/01/27
[#107346] [Ruby master Misc#18557] DevMeeting-2022-02-17 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>
Issue #18557 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
18 messages
2022/01/29
[ruby-core:107052] [Ruby master Feature#18438] Add `Exception#additional_message` to show additional error information
From:
"Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>
Date:
2022-01-11 14:38:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #107052
Issue #18438 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
@nobu How so? Do you have an example?
The responsibilities for `description` are to call `super` and include it in the return value. That's it, nothing else.
The same goes for `additional_message` and is necessary if there are multiple definitions of `additional_message` in the ancestors.
Except it's less clear for `additional_message` because the default `additional_message` returns `""`.
And so how to avoid an extra `\n` before? That'd probably means harder to write a correct `additional_message` => `msg = super; msg.empty? ? extra : "#{msg}\n#{extra}"`.
This is not a problem for `description`, where `super` always returns a non-empty String (unless the original message is empty, but that's then basically a bug of who raised it) => `"#{super}\n#{extra}`.
The class, backtraces and causes are added later by `full_message`, because there is no value to add them before and it's not trivial to add them (the class is always shown on the first line, even for a multi-line message, that's already current behavior).
----------------------------------------
Feature #18438: Add `Exception#additional_message` to show additional error information
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18438#change-95883
* Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
## Proposal
I'd like to introduce a method `Exception#additional_message`, and let the Ruby error printer show it after `Exception#message`.
```ruby
class MyError < StandardError
def message = "my error!"
def additional_message = "This is\nan additional\nmessage"
end
raise MyError
```
```
$ ./miniruby test.rb
test.rb:6:in `<main>': my error! (MyError)
| This is
| an additional
| message
```
PoC implementation: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/5351
## Motivation
At the present time, did_you_mean and error_highlight overrides `Exception#message` to add their suggestions.
```ruby
begin; 1.time; rescue NoMethodError; pp $!.message; end
#=> "undefined method `time' for 1:Integer\n" +
# "\n" +
# " 1.time\n" +
# " ^^^^^\n" +
# "Did you mean? times"
```
This implementation approach has a practical problem. Because it changes the return value of `Exception#message`, it breaks a test that checks the return value of `Exception#message`.
Though such a test is never recommended, I encountered some actual cases when creating error_highlight. See the change of tests of minitest as a typical example: https://github.com/seattlerb/minitest/pull/880/files
Currently, error_highlight shows hint information only for NoMethodError because it is relatively rare to check the message of `NameError`. Still, it broke some tests unfortunately, though. If possible, I'd like to add suggestions to other kinds of errors, but it will break much more tests.
If `Exception#additional_message` is introduced, and if did_you_mean and error_highlight overrides the method to add their suggestions, this problem will not occur because they no longer changes the result value of `#message` method.
## Cooperation needed
Currently, many Ruby/Rails users montiors their production services by using application monitoring services such as Sentry, DataDog, ScoutAPM, etc. The original motivation of error_highlight is for production (see #17930), so it will lose the significance if such services do not support `Exception#additional_message`. So, I'd like to hear opinions from developers of such services. If they are against this proposal or if we can't get their cooperation, I don't think my proposal should be accepted.
If you are a developer of these services, I would be very grateful if you could comment on this ticket. @ivoanjo
## Bikesheds
* I'm unsure if `Exception#additional_message` is a good name. Please propose alternatives if it is not good.
* Currently, the result of `addtional_message` is printed with no escape. This may be a more compatible solution against https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18367.
* It may be good to let `Exception#additional_message` accept `highlight` keyword as boolean information whether the output target is a terminal or not. Currently `Exception#full_message` accepts it. I have no plan to use the information in `error_highlight`, though. Not only `highlight` but also any keywords may be forwarded from `full_message(**opt)` to `additional_message(**opt)` for future use case.
* My current PoC adds prefixs "`| `" before each line of `addtional_message`. I'm unsure if this is good or bad. I'm happy to change or remove the prefixes.
---Files--------------------------------
截圖 2021-12-27 15.56.00.png (74.9 KB)
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>