[#366855] what is the correct way to extend native methods? — Maurizio De Santis <desantis.maurizio@...>

Hello!

15 messages 2010/08/01
[#366857] Re: what is the correct way to extend native methods? — James Harrison <oscartheduck@...> 2010/08/01

> return self.select{ |val| val.to_s =~ args[0] } if args.size == 1

[#366864] Re: what is the correct way to extend native methods? — Maurizio De Santis <desantis.maurizio@...> 2010/08/01

James Harrison wrote:

[#366866] Re: what is the correct way to extend native methods? — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/01

Maurizio De Santis wrote:

[#366916] How to remove leading &nbsp; from string — Lucky Nl <lakshmi27.u@...>

Hi

13 messages 2010/08/02

[#366931] Iteration through File.file? misses entries for which File.file?(entry) == true — Kyle Barbour <kyle@...>

Hello everyone,

11 messages 2010/08/02

[#367167] Project name ownership and conflict — Emmanuel Gomez <emmanuel.gomez@...>

I recently had a discussion with a fellow Ruby developer that revealed a

13 messages 2010/08/05

[#367169] Abstracting exception handling — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

Hello,

15 messages 2010/08/05
[#367173] Re: Abstracting exception handling — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/05

> I suspect something is going out of scope and lost?

[#367176] Re: Abstracting exception handling — Martin Hansen <mail@...> 2010/08/05

I was hoping for a setup like this in two files:

[#367177] Re: Abstracting exception handling — Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@...> 2010/08/05

What kind of stuff are you doing in my_script.rb? Defining a class? A

[#367179] Re: Abstracting exception handling — Martin Hansen <mail@...> 2010/08/05

Andrew Wagner wrote:

[#367372] Is there any human talkable ruby library? — Sniper Abandon <sathish.salem.1984@...>

Is there any human talk able(like Eliza ) ruby library?

12 messages 2010/08/09

[#367438] Determining whether the running ruby is outdated? — Lars Olsson <lasso@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2010/08/10

[#367540] Ruby is in Grave Danger! — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

Dear Friends,

34 messages 2010/08/11

[#367631] Parsing, BNF, TreeTop, GhostWheel, ... — Philipp Kempgen <lists@...>

Hi,

13 messages 2010/08/12

[#367664] libstdc++ — Pw Ktp <amar.seeam@...>

when trying to install a gem i am getting a 'libstdc++' not installed

24 messages 2010/08/13
[#367666] Re: libstdc++ — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/13

Pw Ktp wrote:

[#367668] Re: libstdc++ — Pw Ktp <amar.seeam@...> 2010/08/13

Brian Candler wrote:

[#367670] Re: libstdc++ — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/13

OK, probably missing headers as Daniel said. Try:

[#367671] Re: libstdc++ — Pw Ktp <amar.seeam@...> 2010/08/13

Brian Candler wrote:

[#367703] Question about learning Ruby effectively — Chan Nguyen <cnguyen@...>

Hi everyone,

12 messages 2010/08/14

[#367781] Unix Philosophy in Ruby Programing — Diego Bernardes <di3go.bernardes@...>

I use Linux about 5 years, but, this year that i started to "use" linux.

22 messages 2010/08/16

[#367833] can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Bruce Wayner <winshocker@...>

still i don't know how to begin my program on this problem:

56 messages 2010/08/17
[#367834] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Jean-Julien Fleck <jeanjulien.fleck@...> 2010/08/17

> Requirements:

[#367837] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Bruce Wayner <winshocker@...> 2010/08/17

Jean-Julien Fleck wrote:

[#367839] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Jean-Julien Fleck <jeanjulien.fleck@...> 2010/08/17

> Cheers Thanks, anyway i already did writing and other stuff but the only

[#367849] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@...> 2010/08/17

Hmm, I may or may not disagree with you on what the output should be. I

[#367850] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/17

Andrew Wagner wrote:

[#367853] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@...> 2010/08/17

>

[#367858] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Bruce Wayner <winshocker@...> 2010/08/17

A superhighway connects one large metropolitan area to another.

[#367862] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@...> 2010/08/17

>

[#367867] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Jean-Julien Fleck <jeanjulien.fleck@...> 2010/08/17

> You bring up an interesting point about going

[#367873] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@...> 2010/08/17

Well, it may be interesting, but not in terms of the question originally

[#367911] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — brabuhr@... 2010/08/17

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Andrew Wagner <wagner.andrew@gmail.com> wrote:

[#367922] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — brabuhr@... 2010/08/17

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:19 PM, <brabuhr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#367937] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Bruce Wayner <winshocker@...> 2010/08/18

can someone post some code here: I'm only a newbie in ruby :( and

[#367946] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/18

Bruce Wayner wrote:

[#367952] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Bruce Wayner <winshocker@...> 2010/08/18

sorry I'm totally suck in ruby here is my code:

[#367965] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/18

> sorry I'm totally suck in ruby here is my code:

[#367967] Re: can i do this in ruby? a simulation process — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/18

>> if $delay1==0;

[#367884] Making File.open work on gzipped files — Martin Hansen <mail@...>

Hello all,

15 messages 2010/08/17
[#367893] Re: Making File.open work on gzipped files — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2010/08/17

> This works nicely, but I would like it to work on gzipped files too.

[#367919] Re: Making File.open work on gzipped files — Martin Hansen <mail@...> 2010/08/17

Thanks Brian,

[#367910] Ruby GC question (MRI, JRuby, etc) — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>

My basic understanding of the garbage collectors in use by the various Ruby runtimes is that they all search for objects from a "root" memory object. If an object cannot be reached from this root, then it is collected.

11 messages 2010/08/17

[#367983] Ruby 1.9.2 is released — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

23 messages 2010/08/18
[#368021] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2 is released — botp <botpena@...> 2010/08/19

2010/8/18 Yuki Sonoda (Yugui) <yugui@yugui.jp>:

[#368023] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.2 is released — botp <botpena@...> 2010/08/19

> weird, since rvm does install it fine.

[#368000] Ruby Code Parsing — Jonathan Bale <webmaster@...>

I have a Perl friend asking me questions about how ruby parses its code.

15 messages 2010/08/18

[#368005] Check existence of object and it's property at the same time — Cory Patterson <coryp@...>

I run into this from time to time and I was wondering if there is a

10 messages 2010/08/18

[#368076] Shoes 3 released — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>

Hey there everyone. We've just released Shoes 3, "Policeman", to

19 messages 2010/08/19

[#368199] A small problem for arrays — Unc88 Unc88 <unc88@...>

I have 2 array. ar_1, ar_2

11 messages 2010/08/21

[#368343] gem list --remote does not work on windows running ruby 1.9.2p0 — botp <botpena@...>

Title says all.

9 messages 2010/08/24

[#368384] ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...>

I've just released version 0.3.3 of the ffi-ncurses gem. This fixes

22 messages 2010/08/25
[#368423] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — "R.. Kumar 1.9.1 OSX" <sentinel1879@...> 2010/08/26

Sean O'halpin wrote:

[#368500] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...> 2010/08/27

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:20 AM, R.. Kumar 1.9.1 OSX

[#368533] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — botp <botpena@...> 2010/08/28

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Sean O'Halpin <sean.ohalpin@gmail.com> wrote:

[#368538] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...> 2010/08/28

[#368546] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — botp <botpena@...> 2010/08/28

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@gmail.com> wrote:

[#368556] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...> 2010/08/28

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 9:47 AM, botp <botpena@gmail.com> wrote:

[#368623] Re: ffi-ncurses 0.3.3 — Rahul Kumar <sentinel1879@...> 2010/08/30

[#368471] how about Array#collect_until — timr <timrandg@...>

I am wondering if anyone has implemented an Array#collect_until method

14 messages 2010/08/27

[#368506] select tr>3 with nokogiri — Pen Ttt <myocean135@...>

13 messages 2010/08/27

[#368690] Namespaces too looooooong — Iain Barnett <iainspeed@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2010/08/31
[#368692] Re: Namespaces too looooooong — Joel VanderWerf <joelvanderwerf@...> 2010/08/31

On 08/30/2010 05:51 PM, Iain Barnett wrote:

[#368694] Re: Namespaces too looooooong — Iain Barnett <iainspeed@...> 2010/08/31

Re: Ruby Code Parsing

From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2010-08-24 16:43:15 UTC
List: ruby-talk #368375
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:38:42PM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:
>=20
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 08:10 , Chad Perrin wrote:
>=20
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:20:54PM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 2010, at 20:12 , Chad Perrin wrote:
> >>>=20
> >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:38:40AM +0900, Caleb Clausen wrote:
> >>>>=20
> >>>> Ruby is designed to be easy for humans to read, which means it is not
> >>>> easy for computers to parse. As opposed to say, perl, which is hard
> >>>> for both humans and computers to parse. If you were to write down in
> >>>> one email a complete set of rules, it would be a pretty long email.
> >>>=20
> >>> I find Perl pretty easy to parse.  Maybe yours is a personal problem.
> >>=20
> >> No, you do not find perl pretty easy to parse. Last time I checked, you
> >> can NOT statically parse perl. You have to evaluate it in order to get
> >> a proper parse. So, you find it pretty easy to evaluate. No easy task
> >> for me, I'll admit, but there is no reason for you to be an ass about
> >> it.=20
> >=20
> > Regardless of nitpicky phrasing, I found your comment about Perl kind of
> > ass-ish.  It seems kind of ironic to be called an ass for pointing out
> > that your problems with Perl may not be others' problems, when you make=
 a
> > categorical deprecating statement about Perl.
>=20
> There is nothing nitpicky about it. YOU _can't_ parse perl, yet you
> claim you can and that it is pretty easy.=20
>=20
> If you think it is so easy, here is a challenge: write a parser for
> perl in ruby. It can't be that hard, right? I have one in ruby, and it
> "only" took 145 commits (so far) to do. I don't care what type of
> parser style you choose (LALR, RDP, PEG, etc), and I don't care if you
> choose to port someone else's parser to ruby... but you can NOT
> evaluate/interpret the code in order to determine your parse trees. It
> has to be a 100% static parse.
>=20
> P.S. Even tho it was Caleb who made the "deprecating statement" about
> perl (nice double-entendre considering we're all still waiting for perl
> 6... 10 years later), I totally agree with him on this one.

You apparently think I'm saying my brain has an implementation of the
perl runtime installed on it.  By that standard, none of us can parse
Perl, or Ruby, or Python, or C, or Scheme, or any other nontrivial
computer programming language.

I'm just saying that I can look at some Perl code and figure out what
it's doing -- a necessary task if you're going to try to maintain some
Perl code.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

In This Thread