[#2332] Ruby-Python fusion? — mrilu <mrilu@...>
Usually I give some time for news to settle before I pass the word, but
7 messages
2000/04/01
[#2353] Re: Function of Array.filter surprises me — schneik@...
5 messages
2000/04/03
[#2361] crontab — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I want to have a program that may be run between certain times.
11 messages
2000/04/05
[#2375] Marshal: Want string out, but want depth specified? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
@encoded = [Marshal.dump(@decoded, , depth)].pack("m")
7 messages
2000/04/07
[#2378] Re: Marshal: Want string out, but want depth specified?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/04/07
Hi,
[#2376] Iterator into array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
15 messages
2000/04/07
[#2397] Could missing 'end' be reported better? — mrilu <mrilu@...>
I'm not sure one could easily parse, or moreover report, this error better.
5 messages
2000/04/08
[#2404] Re: Iterator into array — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>It's still possible to introduce a new syntax for collecting yielded
6 messages
2000/04/08
[#2412] Re: Could missing 'end' be reported better? — h.fulton@...
7 messages
2000/04/09
[#2414] Re: Could missing 'end' be reported better?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/04/09
Hi,
[#2429] Please join me, I'm Hashing documentation — mrilu <mrilu@...>
This is a story about my hashing ventures, try to bear with me.
5 messages
2000/04/10
[#2459] Precedence question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/04/12
[#2474] Ruby 1.4.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.4.4 is out, check out:
5 messages
2000/04/14
[#2494] ANNOUNCE : PL/Ruby — ts <decoux@...>
7 messages
2000/04/17
[#2514] frozen behavior — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
7 messages
2000/04/19
[#2530] Re: 'in' vs. 'into' — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>Hmm, I've not decided yet. Here's the list of options:
6 messages
2000/04/20
[#2535] Default naming for iterator parameters — mrilu <mrilu@...>
I'm back at my computer after some traveling. I know I think Ruby
5 messages
2000/04/20
[#2598] different thread semantics 1.4.3 -> 1.4.4 — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Hi fellow rubies,
4 messages
2000/04/28
[ruby-talk:02587] Re: Replies for
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-04-27 03:21:51 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #2587
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:02583] Replies for"
on 00/04/27, mrilu <mrilu@ale.cx> writes:
|I wonder why my earlier message was avoided. Answers to this help me to
|write better in the future.
Sorry, it was just in the middle of my 2 week off from office. I put
your mail in the ToDo queue, then forgot it. Terribly sorry.
|I'm still waiting replies for my message [ruby-talk:02339] regarding
|following topics:
|- description of differences and uses for irb, eval and debug
irb - interactive ruby.
eval.rb - ditto. obsoleted by irb.
debug.rb - ruby debugger. input must be fit in a line.
|- patching policy: mail to list, to matz or direct cvs (possible?)
| - if mailing should patch be in body or as attachment
Mailing a patch to this list is preferable for me, if it isn't too big
(i.e. less than 200 lines). Some trusted contributors have their
account for the CVS repository.
|- few questions regarding unclear debug functionality
In message "[ruby-talk:02339] Patch: Debugger help"
on 00/04/02, mrilu <mrilu@ale.cx> writes:
>+ b[reak] [filename:]<line> set breakpoint to some position
>+ I'm a little bit unsure here. break doesn't seem to use filename.
Enther filename or method name is OK for the prefix.
>+ m[ethod] i[nstance] <obj> show object's methods
>+ m[ethod] <obj> show object's instance methods
>+ Should these method listings be in other order?
+ m[ethod] i[nstance] <obj> show object's methods
+ m[ethod] <obj> show instance methods of class or module
>+ th[read] c[ur[rent]] list current threads
>+ Stopped threads?
>
>Bad name, IMO, if this lists stopped threads. 'Current' is already
>overloaded in stopping threads.
It shows the current thread information. Current would not be
overridden since no context switch would happen in the debugger.
|- help language issues
|
|Maybe there should be some common i18 or localization policy in Ruby, so
|that it would ship with at least English and Japanese helps built-in.
English is OK for me. I18N effort will be done someday.
Their's only one I18N policy for Ruby.
It should not cause me trouble handling Japanese.
How poor it is. I'm still surveying real I18N stuff.
matz.