[#2332] Ruby-Python fusion? — mrilu <mrilu@...>
Usually I give some time for news to settle before I pass the word, but
7 messages
2000/04/01
[#2353] Re: Function of Array.filter surprises me — schneik@...
5 messages
2000/04/03
[#2361] crontab — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
I want to have a program that may be run between certain times.
11 messages
2000/04/05
[#2375] Marshal: Want string out, but want depth specified? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
@encoded = [Marshal.dump(@decoded, , depth)].pack("m")
7 messages
2000/04/07
[#2378] Re: Marshal: Want string out, but want depth specified?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/04/07
Hi,
[#2376] Iterator into array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
15 messages
2000/04/07
[#2397] Could missing 'end' be reported better? — mrilu <mrilu@...>
I'm not sure one could easily parse, or moreover report, this error better.
5 messages
2000/04/08
[#2404] Re: Iterator into array — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>It's still possible to introduce a new syntax for collecting yielded
6 messages
2000/04/08
[#2412] Re: Could missing 'end' be reported better? — h.fulton@...
7 messages
2000/04/09
[#2414] Re: Could missing 'end' be reported better?
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/04/09
Hi,
[#2429] Please join me, I'm Hashing documentation — mrilu <mrilu@...>
This is a story about my hashing ventures, try to bear with me.
5 messages
2000/04/10
[#2459] Precedence question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/04/12
[#2474] Ruby 1.4.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Ruby 1.4.4 is out, check out:
5 messages
2000/04/14
[#2494] ANNOUNCE : PL/Ruby — ts <decoux@...>
7 messages
2000/04/17
[#2514] frozen behavior — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>
7 messages
2000/04/19
[#2530] Re: 'in' vs. 'into' — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>
>Hmm, I've not decided yet. Here's the list of options:
6 messages
2000/04/20
[#2535] Default naming for iterator parameters — mrilu <mrilu@...>
I'm back at my computer after some traveling. I know I think Ruby
5 messages
2000/04/20
[#2598] different thread semantics 1.4.3 -> 1.4.4 — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Hi fellow rubies,
4 messages
2000/04/28
[ruby-talk:02493] Re: ext/Setup (Re: Re: Ruby 1.4.4)
From:
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date:
2000-04-17 08:10:50 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #2493
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > Hi, > > In message "[ruby-talk:02475] Re: Ruby 1.4.4" > on 00/04/14, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes: > > | 3. Remove comment mark(#) before the module names from ext/Setup (or > | add module names if not present), if you want to link modules > | statically. > | > |If I don't do that, do I get them dynamically, or not at all? > > If you don't uncomment them, you don't get them statically linked. > Ruby tries to compile them dynamically anyway, unless the "option > nodynamic" line is uncommented. > > Did I make it clear? Yes, I think so. Thank you. > > matz. Hugh hgs@dmu.ac.uk