[#88240] [Ruby trunk Feature#14759] [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc — sam.saffron@...
Issue #14759 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
[#88251] Re: [ruby-alerts:8236] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64134)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[#88305] [Ruby trunk Bug#14968] [PATCH] io.c: make all pipes nonblocking by default — normalperson@...
Issue #14968 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
[#88331] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — samuel@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
[#88342] [Ruby trunk Feature#14955] [PATCH] gc.c: use MADV_FREE to release most of the heap page body — ko1@...
Issue #14955 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88433] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — ko1@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#88475] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — ko1@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88491] Re: [ruby-cvs:71466] k0kubun:r64374 (trunk): test_function.rb: skip running test — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
k0kubun@ruby-lang.org wrote:
I see. Please remove the test if the test is unnecessary.
Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com> wrote:
[#88523] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#88549] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[#88676] [Ruby trunk Misc#15014] thread.c: use rb_hrtime_scalar for high-resolution time operations — ko1@...
Issue #15014 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2018/08/27 16:16, Eric Wong wrote:
[#88716] Re: [ruby-dev:43715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #595] Fiber ignores ensure clause — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#88723] [Ruby trunk Bug#15041] [PATCH] cont.c: set th->root_fiber to current fiber at fork — ko1@...
Issue #15041 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88767] [Ruby trunk Bug#15050] GC after forking with fibers crashes — ko1@...
Issue #15050 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#88774] Re: [ruby-alerts:8955] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64594)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[ruby-core:88741] [Ruby trunk Bug#15043] MinGW intermittent test failure - TestIO#test_select_leak
Issue #15043 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L). @normalperson Eric, Thanks for looking at it and also the patch. It passed test-all, but as mentioned, it's intermittent and I can't repo it with ruby-loco... Greg ---------------------------------------- Bug #15043: MinGW intermittent test failure - TestIO#test_select_leak https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15043#change-73795 * Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.0dev (2018-08-29 trunk 64589) [x64-mingw32] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- @normalperson Eric, Thought I'd ping you on this, as the test is very new. The above test is not failing on Travis Ubuntu, nor Appveyor mswin or ruby-loco. It is intermittently failing on the recently added Ruby Appveyor mingw job. Console output is: ``` 1) Failure: TestIO#test_select_leak [C:/projects/ruby/test/ruby/test_io.rb:3833]: pid 1384 exit 1 | #<Thread:0x0000000001f9f8c0@-:11 run> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true): | select used to leak on exception (StandardError) | -: select used to leak on exception (StandardError) ``` As far as I can tell, there are two main differences between ruby mingw & ruby-loco. First, I'm passing a `-j` parameter to the test framework, Ruby mingw is passing it to the make command. Secondly, I'm updating the build system (MSYS2/MinGW), Ruby mingw is not. Appveyor can get a few months behind. I ran the test file a few times locally using runner.rb, both normal & parallel. All tests passed, two skips when run normal, eight skips when run parallel. Finally, the Appveyor VM's have two procs, I believe Travis' Vm's are four. Build/test times can vary quite a bit on Appveyor. Thanks, Greg -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>