[#88240] [Ruby trunk Feature#14759] [PATCH] set M_ARENA_MAX for glibc malloc — sam.saffron@...
Issue #14759 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
[#88251] Re: [ruby-alerts:8236] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64134)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[#88305] [Ruby trunk Bug#14968] [PATCH] io.c: make all pipes nonblocking by default — normalperson@...
Issue #14968 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
[#88331] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — samuel@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ioquatix (Samuel Williams).
[#88342] [Ruby trunk Feature#14955] [PATCH] gc.c: use MADV_FREE to release most of the heap page body — ko1@...
Issue #14955 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88433] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — ko1@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
[#88475] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — ko1@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88491] Re: [ruby-cvs:71466] k0kubun:r64374 (trunk): test_function.rb: skip running test — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
k0kubun@ruby-lang.org wrote:
I see. Please remove the test if the test is unnecessary.
Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@gmail.com> wrote:
[#88523] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
eregontp@gmail.com wrote:
[#88549] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed — eregontp@...
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
[#88676] [Ruby trunk Misc#15014] thread.c: use rb_hrtime_scalar for high-resolution time operations — ko1@...
Issue #15014 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
ko1@atdot.net wrote:
On 2018/08/27 16:16, Eric Wong wrote:
[#88716] Re: [ruby-dev:43715] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #595] Fiber ignores ensure clause — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Koichi Sasada wrote:
[#88723] [Ruby trunk Bug#15041] [PATCH] cont.c: set th->root_fiber to current fiber at fork — ko1@...
Issue #15041 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
[#88767] [Ruby trunk Bug#15050] GC after forking with fibers crashes — ko1@...
Issue #15050 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
Koichi Sasada <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#88774] Re: [ruby-alerts:8955] failure alert on trunk@P895 (NG (r64594)) — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
ko1c-failure@atdot.net wrote:
[ruby-core:88549] [Ruby trunk Bug#14999] ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed
Issue #14999 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
> Maybe wishful thinking, but r64464 might be the right fix.
Seems it's not yet fully fixed unfortunately:
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk_clang_39@silicon-docker/1236189
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk_gcc5@silicon-docker/1236243
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-asserts-nopara@silicon-docker/1236250
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk_gcc5@silicon-docker/1236262
http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk-mjit-wait@silicon-docker/1236304
I think we need to give some thinking on this,
and I don't want to stress you to fix it to fix the build.
(although this should be solved soon IMHO, latest before the next preview/RC)
So I propose to "tag" the spec so it won't run in CI, so you can focus on it when there is time.
I'll do that tomorrow if you agree.
It would be also be interesting to see if Ruby <= 2.5 actually ensured the semantics I described above.
----------------------------------------
Bug #14999: ConditionVariable doesn't reacquire the Mutex if Thread#kill-ed
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14999#change-73610
* Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze)
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: normalperson (Eric Wong)
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.6.0dev (2018-08-16 trunk 64394) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
These specs reproduce the issue:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oracle/truffleruby/master/spec/ruby/library/conditionvariable/wait_spec.rb
I can commit them, but of course they will fail.
Feel free to just copy it to MRI's spec/ruby/library/conditionvariable/wait_spec.rb
(I would do it when synchronizing specs anyway)
I'd guess it's caused by the recent timer thread changes or so.
This spec works fine on 2.5.1 and older.
Just copy-pasting the spec out allows for a standalone reproducer:
~~~ ruby
m = Mutex.new
cv = ConditionVariable.new
in_synchronize = false
owned = nil
th = Thread.new do
m.synchronize do
in_synchronize = true
begin
cv.wait(m)
ensure
owned = m.owned?
$stderr.puts "\nThe Thread doesn't own the Mutex!" unless owned
end
end
end
# wait for m to acquire the mutex
Thread.pass until in_synchronize
# wait until th is sleeping (ie waiting)
Thread.pass while th.status and th.status != "sleep"
m.synchronize {
cv.signal
# Wait that the thread is blocked on acquiring the Mutex
sleep 0.001
# Kill the thread, yet the thread should first acquire the Mutex before going on
th.kill
}
th.join
~~~
Result on trunk:
~~~
The Thread doesn't own the Mutex!
#<Thread:0x0000565216f4ba28@cv_bug.rb:6 aborting> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true):
Traceback (most recent call last):
1: from cv_bug.rb:7:in `block in <main>'
cv_bug.rb:7:in `synchronize': Attempt to unlock a mutex which is not locked (ThreadError)
Traceback (most recent call last):
1: from cv_bug.rb:7:in `block in <main>'
cv_bug.rb:7:in `synchronize': Attempt to unlock a mutex which is not locked (ThreadError)
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>