[#87467] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — mofezilla@...
Issue #14841 has been reported by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
3 messages
2018/06/10
[#87515] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — hirura@...
Issue #14841 has been updated by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
7 messages
2018/06/19
[#87516] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura@gmail.com wrote:
[#87517] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
Sorry, I left this out: If you can reproduce it again, can you
[#87519] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— hirura <hirura@...>
2018/06/19
Hi Eric,
[#87521] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura <hirura@gmail.com> wrote:
[#87541] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — normalperson@...
Issue #14859 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87605] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/06/23
[#87614] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — normalperson@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/23
[#87631] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
5 messages
2018/06/25
[#87635] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/25
takashikkbn@gmail.com wrote:
[#87665] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — eregontp@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/28
[#87710] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/06/30
[ruby-core:87528] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14857] collect malloc info
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-06-20 08:54:26 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87528
Thank you for looking into this. I have been thinking about malloc usage, and am wondering why we use malloc heavily instead of a specialized allocator (perhaps based on dlmalloc 2.8.6, it is small, fast, and has a good API for embedding). Current malloc accounting has one GIANT weakness: * We have no visibility into when malloc requests more memory from the kernel (via mmap/sbrk). With normal object allocation, we perform GC before allocating new object pages. But we can't perform GC to prevent malloc from increasing it's internal heap size via mmap/sbrk. Disadvantage of custom allocator (over ordinary malloc): - tools support for debugging leaks and errors requires more work. However, I know valgrind can be made to work with custom allocators There'll also be compile-time option to use system malloc for testing and for error checking (e.g. OpenBSD malloc) Old malloc accounting may always be supported for C extension compatibility, but reliance on it will be less. Basically, same compatibility+migration strategy as RGenGC. Also, for future APIs, I suggest including owner VALUE as an argument for *alloc functions. I think we can give hints to prioritize sweeping for heap_pages with the biggest *alloc users. And maybe pass `ec' around, too for thread-safety if multiple mspace: /* VALUE owner is a hint, may be ignored */ void *rb_mspace_alloc(rb_execution_context *ec, VALUE owner, size_t size); void rb_mspace_free(rb_execution_context_t *ec, VALUE owner, void *ptr); Anyways, the data you gather from this patch should be useful regardless. Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>