[#87467] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — mofezilla@...
Issue #14841 has been reported by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
3 messages
2018/06/10
[#87515] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — hirura@...
Issue #14841 has been updated by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
7 messages
2018/06/19
[#87516] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura@gmail.com wrote:
[#87517] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
Sorry, I left this out: If you can reproduce it again, can you
[#87519] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— hirura <hirura@...>
2018/06/19
Hi Eric,
[#87521] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura <hirura@gmail.com> wrote:
[#87541] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — normalperson@...
Issue #14859 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87605] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/06/23
[#87614] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — normalperson@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/23
[#87631] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
5 messages
2018/06/25
[#87635] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/25
takashikkbn@gmail.com wrote:
[#87665] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — eregontp@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/28
[#87710] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/06/30
[ruby-core:87525] [Ruby trunk Bug#14464] MJIT & MinGW / gcc 7.3.0 seemed ok as of 62337, fail or skip after
From:
Greg.mpls@...
Date:
2018-06-20 04:15:34 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87525
Issue #14464 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L). k0kubun, First of all, thanks for all your work on MJIT. Lately, I've been testing a few extension gems, and I just decided to try JIT on EventMachine, which normally passes. Got thru quite a bit of it, but then a SEGV. 1. Would you like a log, etc? 2. If so, here, or open a new issue? Re Windows, many gems are not testing with new Ruby versions, and they're also behind in releasing fat-binary gems for new Ruby versions. I've been involved in the first issue, now I'm moving to the second. While working to help build Windows fat-binary gems on Appveyor, I realized that most of the work needed to build fat binaries is the same as the work needed to test on Appveyor. Hence, to repo these issues, a fat-binary will be available... Thanks, Greg ---------------------------------------- Bug #14464: MJIT & MinGW / gcc 7.3.0 seemed ok as of 62337, fail or skip after https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14464#change-72529 * Author: MSP-Greg (Greg L) * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun) * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.6.0dev (2018-05-23 trunk 63492) [x64-mingw32] * Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- First of all, a thank you to those working on MJIT. At least three builds of ruby-loco MinGW passed the MJIT tests (62327, 62331, 62337), but after that, the tests have either failed or skipped. First fail was at 62341. The most recent build (2018-02-11 trunk 62371), skipped with no timeout error in `jit_supported?` I haven't looked at patching `test_jit.rb` to see if I can get more info. I don't know if this is a MinGW issue or a gcc 7.3.0 issue, but, given that it did work for a few builds, I would appreciate it if someone could look into it. Anything I can help with, I'm happy to. Thanks, Greg ---Files-------------------------------- TestJIT_info_62380.txt (33.4 KB) MJIT-MinGW-63333.txt (28.7 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>