[#87467] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — mofezilla@...
Issue #14841 has been reported by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
3 messages
2018/06/10
[#87515] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — hirura@...
Issue #14841 has been updated by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
7 messages
2018/06/19
[#87516] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura@gmail.com wrote:
[#87517] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
Sorry, I left this out: If you can reproduce it again, can you
[#87519] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— hirura <hirura@...>
2018/06/19
Hi Eric,
[#87521] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura <hirura@gmail.com> wrote:
[#87541] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — normalperson@...
Issue #14859 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87605] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/06/23
[#87614] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — normalperson@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/23
[#87631] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
5 messages
2018/06/25
[#87635] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/25
takashikkbn@gmail.com wrote:
[#87665] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — eregontp@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/28
[#87710] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/06/30
[ruby-core:87339] [Ruby trunk Bug#14804] GzipReader cannot read Freebase dump (but gzcat/zless can)
From:
amadanmath@...
Date:
2018-06-01 07:27:17 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87339
Issue #14804 has been reported by amadan (Goran Topic).
----------------------------------------
Bug #14804: GzipReader cannot read Freebase dump (but gzcat/zless can)
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14804
* Author: amadan (Goran Topic)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: Ruby 2.4.1p111 (2017-03-22 revision 58053) [x86_64-darwin17]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
This is likely related to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35354951/gzipstream-quietly-fails-on-large-file-stream-ends-at-2gb (and its accepted answer).
The file in question: http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/freebase-public/rdf/freebase-rdf-latest.gz
(watch out, it's 30Gb compressed!)
Steps to reproduce:
require "zlib"
Zlib::GzipReader.open("freebase-rdf-latest.gz") { |f| f.each_line.count }
# => 14374340
However, the correct answer is different:
$ gzcat freebase-rdf-latest.gz | wc -l
3130753066
Another experiment showed that the last `f.tell` was `1945715682`, while there's considerably more bytes in the uncompressed version. This fits well with the Stack Overflow report from C# linked above, which states the first "substream" contains exactly that many bytes.
If this is a hard constraint from the wrapped library (and thus should be fixed upstream), at least the documentation should mention it.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>