[#87467] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — mofezilla@...
Issue #14841 has been reported by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
3 messages
2018/06/10
[#87515] [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError — hirura@...
Issue #14841 has been updated by hirura (Hiroyuki URANISHI).
7 messages
2018/06/19
[#87516] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura@gmail.com wrote:
[#87517] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
Sorry, I left this out: If you can reproduce it again, can you
[#87519] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— hirura <hirura@...>
2018/06/19
Hi Eric,
[#87521] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14841] Very rarely IO#readpartial does not raise EOFError
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/19
hirura <hirura@gmail.com> wrote:
[#87541] [Ruby trunk Feature#14859] [PATCH] implement Timeout in VM — normalperson@...
Issue #14859 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/21
[#87605] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been reported by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/06/23
[#87614] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — normalperson@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by normalperson (Eric Wong).
4 messages
2018/06/23
[#87631] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
5 messages
2018/06/25
[#87635] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/06/25
takashikkbn@gmail.com wrote:
[#87665] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — eregontp@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
4 messages
2018/06/28
[#87710] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/06/30
[ruby-core:87424] systemtap usage (was gc.c: make gc_enter+gc_exit pairs dtrace probes)
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-06-06 08:40:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #87424
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14813
Fwiw, I'm still learning systemtap myself; and I made r63581
the dtrace tests to work with systemtap.
I played around with systemtap ~5 years ago for other projects
and forgot much of it :x
For Debian/Ubuntu users:
# as root:
apt-get install systemtap systemtap-sdt-dev
stap-prep # should install necessary kernel headers + debug symbol(*)
adduser $YOUR_USER stapusr
adduser $YOUR_USER stapdev
Red Hat-based systems should be similar; and most of the
systemtap team works for Red Hat. There's also dyninst support
which won't require special privileges (or kernel context
switch), but current Debian stable doesn't enable it, yet.
# (re-)login as regular user:
# rebuild Ruby with --enable-dtrace
# (make sure probes.h has SDT stuff and isn't a dummy file)
# trace a new command
$ stap -v script.stp -c "$RUBY_CMD"
# trace running command
$ stap -v script.stp -x $PID_OF_RUBY
My original example with:
probe process("/path/to/ruby").mark("foo")
was a bit strict since it requires the path of executable.
Now I favor "-x $PID" or "-c $CMD" so I can use:
probe process.mark("foo")
There is also "systemtap-doc" package
I look at docs + *.stp examples in their git tree:
git://sourceware.org/git/systemtap.git
(*) I never tested `stap-prep' myself since I build my own kernels
from source. For people like me who run the latest kernels;
be prepared to backport patches from systemtap.git or
build+install from that yourself. Users of distro-provided
kernels get things working out-of-the-box in my experience.
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>