[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85360] Re: [PATCH] compile.c: avoid String#+@ call with FSL
From:
Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date:
2018-02-03 09:05:36 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85360
"Martin J. D端rst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > On 2018/02/03 16:39, Eric Wong wrote: > > When using "frozen_string_literal: true", String#+@ is often > > > used to create mutable strings. Treat it like an immutable > > > syntax to allow for optimization. > > > Sorry, I don't get this. If somebody wants a mutable String, they should get > a mutable string. Or can we treat it as immutable and later still provide a > mutable string (something like copy on write)? Sorry, confusing wording. What I meant was Ruby syntax is immutable and cannot be redefined at runtime. So I want String#+@ to behave like Ruby syntax (not like typical redefinable method). Actual behavior is unchanged unless somebody redefines String#+@ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>