[#85349] [Ruby trunk Bug#14334] Segmentation fault after running rspec (ruby/2.5.0/erb.rb:885 / simplecov/source_file.rb:85) — pragtob@...
Issue #14334 has been updated by PragTob (Tobias Pfeiffer).
3 messages
2018/02/02
[#85358] Re: [ruby-cvs:69220] nobu:r62039 (trunk): compile.c: unnecessary freezing — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
5 messages
2018/02/03
[#85612] Why require autoconf 2.67+ — leam hall <leamhall@...>
Please pardon the intrusion; I am new to Ruby and like to pull the
6 messages
2018/02/17
[#85634] [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros — normalperson@...
Issue #14494 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
3 messages
2018/02/19
[#85674] [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid — matz@...
Issue #13618 has been updated by matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto).
5 messages
2018/02/20
[#85686] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/02/20
matz@ruby-lang.org wrote:
[#85704] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#13618] [PATCH] auto fiber schedule for rb_wait_for_single_fd and rb_waitpid
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/02/21
On 2018/02/20 18:06, Eric Wong wrote:
[ruby-core:85363] [Ruby trunk Feature#14217] Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR or similar with patch level info for rc/preview as a constant
From:
dev@...
Date:
2018-02-03 20:30:21 UTC
List:
ruby-core #85363
Issue #14217 has been updated by shayonj (Shayon Mukherjee). Is it possible to know, if this is still work keeping open to or if its being considered by the core team? :) ---------------------------------------- Feature #14217: Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR or similar with patch level info for rc/preview as a constant https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14217#change-70143 * Author: shayonj (Shayon Mukherjee) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: ---------------------------------------- ## Problem When ruby is in release candidate or preview, ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL``` is ```-1```. Without parsing ```RUBY_DESCRIPTION```, its hard to tell using constant the right and absolute ruby version. ## Proposal Expose RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR as a constant, just like ```RUBY_VERSION``` or ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL```. So that, we can know the right ruby version, especially when its in preview or release candidate. This is also helpful when using gems that rely on ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL``` and ```RUBY_VERSION``` to serve the right experience. Example: Bundler, which validates gem installation by making sure right ruby is installed. Currently, we cannot install gems using 2.5.0preview1. ~~~ Your Ruby version is 2.5.0, but your Gemfile specified 2.5.0preview1 ~~~ This can be handled in bundler through some different wokraround, but I think by exposing ```RUBY_PATCHLEVEL_STR```, it will be helpful in building the appropriate solutions. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>