From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date: 2018-02-19T17:57:19+00:00
Subject: [ruby-core:85652] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14494] [PATCH] tool/m4/ruby_replace_type.m4 use AC_CHECK_TYPES for HAVE_* macros

nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
> Indeed, it was a mistake.
> Do you think `HAVE_` macros should be defined for all `RUBY_REPLACE_TYPE`?

Probably, but I was wondering what your opinion is.
We only use RUBY_REPLACE_TYPES for common *_t types, so I don't
think there's any conflicts with function names for HAVE_*.

Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>